Laserfiche WebLink
R�GULAR I7EETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUN� 12 , 1979 Page i6 <br /> 2. In cases of two lot divisions where large SUBDIVISION <br /> acreage lots are involved when City requires 2440 North Shore Driv <br /> an outlot: (Continued) <br /> a) Does this not restrict future development - <br /> What are the nechanics and/or procedures <br /> for vacating such outlots. <br /> b) Should City be involved with such substandard <br /> roads? Does tlle requirement of an outlot <br /> suggest City' s interest? <br /> Public Information P•�eeting - t4ay 21, 1979 <br /> The septic inspector has determined that the <br /> existing systen is in poor condition and riust be <br /> repaired. A lot realignment riight prove to be <br /> necessary to give the two-acre lot additional <br /> land to correct e�isting septic problem and afford <br /> additional land for alternate drainfield. <br /> At our last meeting, we raised several questions <br /> concerning the City requiring road outlots for <br /> two lot subdivisons with large acreage. Road <br /> outlots are not restrictive upon future development <br /> because they can be easily relocated with platting <br /> and do not incur extra legal expense or red tape <br /> for the landowner. The City's interest in a road <br /> is not expressed through the means of an outlot <br /> but rather in acquiring the underlying easement. <br /> In the Gluek case, we are not requesting an under- <br /> lying easement. <br /> There were no corunents from the public. The <br /> Planning Commission reviewed with the applicant <br /> the two alternatives for a north boundary line <br /> for the newly created lot. The _applicant preferred <br /> a shoreline boundary as opposed to one that would <br /> be drawn straight north through wetlands. The <br /> Zoning Administrator explained that in a future <br /> platting; the cvetlands would� have to be tied in <br /> with each involved lot. ihis point should again <br /> be made clear by the Planner at the Council' meeting <br /> on June 12, 1979. Planning Comr_mission voted to <br /> reconmend for approval the prelir,tinary plat of <br /> Kathleen Gluek subject to the following condi�ions : . <br /> l. Applicant enter into a Conservation and Flowage <br /> Easenent with the City. <br /> 2. I7ewly defined lot must have the required three <br /> acres of dry contiguous land; applicant to consult <br /> with her surveyor concerning option for north <br /> boundary line, either along shoreline or straight <br /> line to north including the wetland. (Continued) <br />