Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAZ 21EETI2dG OF ^Ii� OROi70 COUP]CTL, APRTL 3, 1979 Page 3 <br /> Planning Cor:uaission 29eetinc� - I.arch 12 , 1979 VARIANCE <br /> 1345 rdorth Arm Drive <br /> Planning Comnission recorunends ap;�roval of the (Continued) <br /> variance application of Fred S. Ryan, subject to <br /> the conditions set forth in the staff r�er�o. <br /> Applicant must provide the abstract pac�es verifving <br /> the street vacation before final anProval frort Council. <br /> Staff Note - P�iarch 20, 1979 <br /> Staff recomrnends approval of t�e variance ap�lication, <br /> for the applicant has corlplied ��it17 all the conditions <br /> sited in r,�emo above. Our office has received a copy <br /> of the abstract pages verifying the vacation of Oak <br /> Place. Pdote that the street was vacated but a 20 ' <br /> easement was acceptec� for use b_y Piinnec�asco. See <br /> the survey co��y. This easer.�ent does not affect the <br /> proposal but its existence raust be noted. <br /> Council PZeeting - April 3, 1979 <br /> :�ayor Van ilest noved, Butler seconded, to approve <br /> the variance re�uest oi Fred S. Ryan, 1345 North <br /> Ar� Drive, Per the Planning Cortm�ssion recor.unendations. <br /> Motion, Ay�es (4) - rlays (0) . <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, entered into the SUBDIVISION <br /> record the request of LAD Development for 405 405 Oxford Street <br /> Oxford Street, dated February 2 , 1979 , which states: #455 <br /> LAD Development <br /> Sketch Plan �teview - The applicant proposes dividing <br /> Lot 1, Block l, Stielow' s Addition, a four-acre lot, <br /> into two lots. P�r. Stielow had included the lot <br /> division in his original plat, but because of septic <br /> diff_iculties causing delay in final plat approval, he <br /> decided against the division. The septic difficulties <br /> involved a mound sl�ster,l design for original Lot 1 <br /> that would meet the approval of both septic inspector <br /> and City Engineer. I understand that a rlound system <br /> has received sta�f approval. Both proposed lots <br /> meet the septic requirer:ients. <br /> Entrance - Both lots to be served by �lat road - <br /> location of entrance subject to staff approval. <br /> �aetlands - ��7etlands involvement for both lots rlust <br /> be deterrlined and a new conservation and flowage <br /> easer_�ent nay be required. <br /> Lot requirements - Lot dirtensions have not been given. <br /> Staff unable to determine if variance is needec�. It <br /> appears tliat the necessary 200 ' of shoreline is available. <br /> Lot 1 mav have sorie costly structural buildinc� <br /> considerations. (Continued) <br />