My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-13-1979 Council Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
03-13-1979 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2015 11:59:12 AM
Creation date
4/22/2015 11:59:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
` REGliL73R ?1E�TIPJG OF THE ORONO COU2ICIL, P�RCFi 13, 1979 Page 6 <br /> In sur.u-�ary, I recorunend: SUBDIVISION <br /> 225 North Ferndale <br /> � l. Approval of attached double residential units (Continued) <br /> subject to Council review prior to building <br /> permit issuance. <br /> 2, Approval of eight units as proposed. <br /> 3. Preliminary plat approval as proposed, <br /> including: <br /> a. private paved road 24 ' wide with road and <br /> utility easement to the City <br /> b. extension of City sewer and water with a new <br /> fire hydrant at the end of the cul-de-sac <br /> and reconnection of the e�:isting building, <br /> subject to a developer' s ac�reer�ent for <br /> construction details <br /> c. submittal and Council approval of _a landscaping <br /> plan for the common outlot <br /> d. open space ease�ent to the� City over. co�:unon <br /> outlot <br /> e, park dedication fees based on new schedule <br /> f. creation of a hor.leowner' s association <br /> acceptable to the City <br /> Staff rdote - Piarch 5, 1979 � <br /> After the February 13, 1979 Council neeting, the <br /> applicant responded to neighborhood concerns by <br /> redesigning his proposal. His February 27, 1979 <br /> plan is for seven detached single fariily units, <br /> clustered in a PRD forr,iat. <br /> The new plan has a density of 0. 96 units/acre (up <br /> fror.► 0. 836 units/acre with the eight unit plan) . . <br /> The sketch is rough but purports to show a design <br /> neeting all setback requirements. The City Engineer <br /> should review the road plan to assure proper width . <br /> and turnarounds. <br /> The plan revision anends the application to: 1) <br /> Subdivision, 2) Planned Residential Development, <br /> 3) 4 o Variance to lot area requirer:�ent. <br /> This proposal appears to answer the concerns of <br /> the Planning Cor.ir�zission and the neighbors regarding <br /> attached units, and the density iriprovement is <br /> consistent with the cor.iments of the Council. I <br /> recor.lmend approval of the revised plan conditioned �Continued) <br /> upon the same iter.ls listed in Itert 3 above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.