03-13-1979 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

, REGTJLAR P''iEETING OF THE OROi10 COUNCIL, P�RCH 13, 1979 Page 2 The resolution sets forth the intent of the Council STUBBS BAY P�iARINA based upon the record of the public hearing, general (Continued) : City records and the liistory of the area. This is not the detailed record of findings as staff is still in the process of preparing that resolution. Rather than rush a draft to the Council, I felt that accuracy out�-�eighed tir;ieliness. I recor:unend that the Council adopt the attached resolution. I also recommend that the Council instruct staff to advertise and call a re�oning public hearing for the first meeting in April. I recor.lmend that the pending George Johnson application for a 1979 r.tarina license be denied based uPon the record of the February 27, 1979 meeting. Council i7eeting - P4arch 13, 1979 PZr. Janes PicCleary was present during the discussion on the Stubbs Bay P4arina. A4avor Van idest asked if he had any corunents concerninc� the resolution. 'T'he i4ayor explained that the resolution included an intention to denv the request of George Johnson for a rnarina license. Pir. I1cCleary stated his objections to the possible rezoning of the property. i�ayor Van Nest inforr,ied him that we are continuing the study of the property to deterr.line whether to rezone to residential or liriited commercial. Butler raoved, P4assengale seconded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #1005 �1005, A Resolution Of Intent Regarding Perriitted Stubbs Bay P�iarina Development Of Stubbs Bay isarina Property. :sotion, Ayes (4) - Pdays (0) . I•4r. Alan Olson also entered into the record his LAND USE STUDY report on a Continuing Land Use Study, which states : The Council' s attention has been focused on the Stubbs Bay Pdarina site because of Psr. Johnson' s requests for early study and policy decisions. Even though the final answer of liriited cor.unercial • vs . residential use has yet to be r.lade, the major research involverient is conplete and staff has riore time to devote to the rest o� the study area. Lot size and housing inventories need to be done an� . the on-site systerl inspection program must he cortpleted. A major area of concern is still the sewer question. I strongly recommend that the City . Engineer be instructed to reopen the alternative waste control study. Since active study was dropped in 1975, several new developments have occurred: (Continued)