Laserfiche WebLink
' R�;GULAR P�SEETING OF THE ORONO COUi7CIL, FEBRUARY 27, 1979 Page 11 <br /> Candace Rowlette also commented that Stubbs Bay is too PUBLIC F3EARING <br /> crowded on a weekend now to accommodate more boats. Stubbs Bay Marina <br /> , "`. �� (Continued) <br /> •' t4arilyn Nelson, 500 Tonkawa Road: The Stubbs Bay is <br /> too fragile to accor-u�odate further densitv. . <br /> Peggy iaatson, 900 Partenwood Road: �•7e were not asked <br /> by the petitioners for P�r. Johnson if the project <br /> r.iet our approval. ���e were only told if P1r. Johnson <br /> �vas not allowed to proceed, he would sue. <br /> L�nory Smith, 3420 Bayside Road: The people at Stubbs <br /> nay do want a low-Profile operation and not a lot of <br /> boats piled in the air. <br /> Gabriel Jabbour, 780 Tonkawa Road: I feel that there <br /> are discrepancies in this proposal and that the <br /> drawings are not accurate. I feel that the bay. has <br /> too much vegetation now and it can only get �aorse <br /> if we allow this marina. <br /> 24r. I'ord Robbins , attorney representing Darryl Carlson, , <br /> 3470 Bayside Road, commented that: P4y client owns <br /> part of Lot 22 & Lot 23. �1e oppose the marina and <br /> the docks. ��e believe the bay overl1 crowded now <br /> and we question the noise level and oppose the application. <br /> ��e feel there are questions with the title and that <br /> the proposed marina does not have title to all of_ the <br /> �' land it clair.is. <br /> Doug Carney: ��7e are not here to clear a title. <br /> This can be settled at a later date. Lot 23 is a <br /> non-lakeshore lot_ <br /> 2laureen LaJoy, 770 Tonkawa Road: I believe the bay <br /> is polluted now and we oppose the marina. <br /> Iir. John Howe, Architect, cor_�unented that: The marina <br /> site will be staffed by someone at all tines. <br /> Mr. Victor Narton, 3550 Bayside Road, questioned what <br /> iripact the loss of taxes would be. <br /> Unidentified person: I would believe that we should <br /> encourage design of high standards, limited uses of <br /> the area, and a valid license to limit 66 slins <br /> and an approved landscape design. I believe that the <br /> rights of an individual should not be taken away. <br /> Iiayor Van Nest: This site was never used as a marina <br /> but was used as a fishing area. Traditionally, this <br /> area was not a full-scale marina for high powered boats. <br /> . ��e have recognized that this area is not conducive for <br /> . a full-scale marina and we certainly have no right <br /> to grant riparian rights to operate 66 slips "for a <br /> r►arina. (Continued) <br />