My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-23-1979 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1979
>
01-23-1979 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2015 11:52:08 AM
Creation date
4/22/2015 11:52:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It�GULAR PiEETING OF �FiE ORONO COUPJCIL, JAPdUARY 23 , 19 79 Page 7 <br /> Probleris were also discussed covering traffic, . STUBBS BAY PiARINA <br /> no sewers in the area, and the flood plain. (Continued) <br /> I'ir. George Johnson restated his request for a <br /> liriited marina saying that he has r�ade application <br /> to include 66 rental slips and 12 dry-land slips. <br /> Councilmermber Pesek corunented that lir.►ited marina <br /> uses in this area seems to be more suitable than a <br /> residential use. $20, 000 hories in the area would <br /> not appear to be condu�ive to a $300, 000 residential <br /> home. • <br /> P�ayor Van Nest: We are still waiting for sufficient <br /> data to make a decision. <br /> Councilrtei*iber isassengale: We do not �aant to close <br /> the door to options for other uses of the property. <br /> Councilmember Pesek: How do we establish standards? <br /> Councilnember l+lassengale: We have not exhausted all <br /> resources available. <br /> George Johnson: If moratorium would not preclude <br /> limited rlarina uses, r.1y a�plication is be�ore vou <br /> with exhibits and surveys. I would appreciate+ <br /> action this evening. T1M2 is runninc� out. t1y <br /> proposal is for a lirlited r.iarina use. t9e want to • <br /> reverse the expanded uses now prevelant with other <br /> marinas. I propose a low profile narina use. We <br /> do not need another e�cpanded narina. Tt is also not <br /> econortically sound to rebuild docY.s for one seasons <br /> rental. <br /> Councilr_Zember Pesek: �4e need reasonable tir.ie to <br /> receive and review data fror.i staff. <br /> Piayor Van ilest: We need to know the notential for <br /> a residence on-site disposal sl�ster.i, Property values , <br /> residenti.al zoning variances rec�uired and what would <br /> be allowed. <br /> Louis B. Oberhauser: r•sr. P�cCleary is concerned �•�ith <br /> a possible rioratoriurl. Studies had been previously <br /> initiated to deterriine that the property is. Lakeshore <br /> Cor.unercial. We have a buyer ready and willing to <br /> buy now and we have a designated area to allow a <br /> marina. This lot is flat and does not lend itself <br /> to construction of a residence and would create a <br /> substandard lot. I think t�4r. Johnson' s proposal � <br /> is a reasonable one. PZr. I4cCleary needs action now. <br /> Councilr.ler�lber tiassengale: Could �•�e initiate morator_ium . <br /> noca? <br /> (Continued) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.