Laserfiche WebLink
?F'GuL.�R i'.:.�'ii�:G OF TIiE OR0:10 COli�vCIL, JN?�L'?'-L�Y 9 , 1979 p�ae � <br /> t�r. Paul C. Clabo �aas present and presented the VPRIA'_�10E <br /> City Council with a letter da�ed January 9 , 1979 1388 Park Drive <br /> � .�� concerning his request for a variance at 1388 Park r43g <br /> Drive. P�ul C. Clabo <br /> After discussion, <br /> Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to table the request <br /> of Paul Clabo for a variance at 1388 Park Drive <br /> until staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the <br /> letter presented by Mr. Clabo. ilotion, Ayes (4) - <br /> Nays (0) . <br /> Mr. Alan Olson, City Planner, informed the City STREET VACATIONS <br /> Council the request by the Hennepin County Park Big Island <br /> Reserve District for street vacations on Big Island. rr444 -- <br /> Henn. County Park Rese <br /> This application is made to vacate all of the public <br /> roads in an area of the west island which is now <br /> owned by the Park Reserve. The area is platted <br /> into ten separated lots which are divided by the <br /> subject roads. The Park Reserve ' s intentions are <br /> to have the roads vacated to pex-Mit cortbination of <br /> the lots into one buildable/saleable lot. <br /> Planning. Commission Meeting - Decenber 11, 1978 <br /> ;:�� <br /> '�'�`� Planning Commission recomr.lended approval of the <br /> vacations of undeveloped roads on Big Island, legally <br /> described as follows: All of Linden Street, all <br /> of Elr.i Street, and all of Maple Place located <br /> within Kate B. Pluruner' s Subdivision of Lot 2 of <br /> Kitchel' s Subdivision of Government Lots 5 & 6. Such <br /> vacation to be approved without relocation of the <br /> public right of way based on the following findings : <br /> l. The vacation does not affect access to or use <br /> of any affected or adjoining property. <br /> 2. The City has not and does not intend to develop, <br /> ir�prove or use the property in any wav. <br /> 3. The property as it exists serves no public <br /> purpose. <br /> 4. The vacation is in the public interest by: <br /> a, furthering the plans of the Park Reserve <br /> District <br /> b. reducing City liability for r�aintenance <br /> c. increasing taxable valuation <br /> 5. The Supreme Court ruling �applies to access to <br /> the lake which is not applicable in this factual <br /> case. The only mer*ibers of the public need'ing <br /> acce-ss are the three affected property owners <br /> .,� who each have independent access available. <br /> � (Continued) <br />