Laserfiche WebLink
�GULA2 ���.,ETIrIG OF THi O?0��0 COJI�CIL, �ANliARY 9 , 1979 Page S <br /> Riparian Rights - The property has riparian . SIIBDIVISION <br /> rights on both Snith Eay and Tanager Lake. Staff 1600 Shoreline Drive <br /> � recorn�-:lends lake access be only _to ianager Lake (Continued) <br /> because of the safety �actor of crossing County <br /> Road n15 to Smith Bay. <br /> Private Road - The location of the proposed road <br /> serving all five lots is satisfactory, but the <br /> existing access point on County Road #15 is not <br /> acceptable. The access location serving one lot <br /> is questionable and serving five lots it becornes <br /> extremely hazardous. The plat will be reviewed <br /> by the Hennepin County Highway Department. . , <br /> Planning Commission P�eeting - October 23, 1978 ' <br /> Planning Commission gave conceptual approval to <br /> the sketch plan for the P4ills subdivision of f_ive <br /> lots. _ The Commission requests that the following <br /> items be noted on the preliminary plat: <br /> 1. 30 ' easer.ient through Lot C be removed. <br /> 2. All the setbacks for the buildings to remain <br /> riust be indicated. <br /> 3. A ninimum of 200 ' of lakeshore for each lot. <br /> 4 . Existing access is questionable. It will be <br /> revie��ed after the County Highway Department <br /> r.iakes their recomr�endation. <br /> 5 . A, B, and C lake access on Tanager Lake. D & E <br /> lake access on Smith Bay. . ' <br /> Sketch Plan Review <br /> Private Road - The private road should be designated <br /> as an outlot with a 50 ' easement. <br /> Lot areas - Lot 2 ' s area is questionable since a 50 ' <br /> road easernent will intersect along the eastern edge <br /> of the lot. The surveyor will have to re-estimate <br /> the two acres of dry buildable for Lots 2 , 3, 4, & 5 <br /> because the road easement was not taken into <br /> consideration. <br /> Lot width - 200 ' lot width as recorded along lake- <br /> shore and at the building site. <br /> Riparian Rights - �he easement through Lot 5 has <br /> been removed and each lot now has single lakeshore <br /> access. <br /> Existing buildings - Planning Cor.u�ission should <br /> address the issue of the two cottages , one is within <br /> the 75 ' lakeshore setback and the other is intersected <br /> by Lots 3 & 4 ' s mutual lot line. They should either be - . <br /> rernoved before final approval or before a building permit <br /> is issued. This should be stated in the final resolution. <br /> • (Continued) <br />