Laserfiche WebLink
REGULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JtJNE 29, 1978 Page 17 <br /> Bruce Douglas, representing P4r. Gayle Wittig, GAYLE' S rZARIPdA <br /> cor.�mented that 1`4r. 47ittig is out of town. We do <br /> aant to deal with the dock length and have <br /> requested fror.► the DNR a list of items that we <br /> are not in �ompliance with. I would be happy <br /> to discuss with you and staff at a later date � <br /> these concerns. It appears to me, continued <br /> Mr. Douglas, that there aresome inconsistencies <br /> with this body, the LP�CD and the DNR. <br /> North Star Marina owner Paul Kempf was present NORTH STAR MARINA <br /> representing North Star Marina. P2r. Kempf referred <br /> to his letter to the City of Orono, dated June 26, <br /> 1978, which states: <br /> "Enclosed is a copy of my letter to Ron Harnack <br /> of Department of Plattzral Resources regarding our <br /> April 21 meeting and his letter to me on which <br /> you were copied. <br /> As I stated we are confused as to the extent of <br /> DNR involvement and how it relates to that of <br /> Orono and Lake P�tinnetonka Conservation District. <br /> I feel these = questions must be answered prior to <br /> detailing out any plan to assure our compliance <br /> in the long run with the multiple agencies we <br /> -�pparently have to deal with. <br /> Please advise me of how Orono views the recent <br /> DNR involvement and how it affects our relationship <br /> and the development of our property. " <br /> Paul Kempf' s letter to Ronald Harnack, DNR, dated <br /> June 26 , 1978, which states: <br /> "This letter is in response to your communication <br /> of May 26, 1978 regarding "Marina Compliance" . <br /> We have been in consultation with our attorneys <br /> regarding the points raised in your letter as well <br /> as the more general nature of Department of Natural <br /> Resources involvement in regulating various aspects <br /> of Lake D4innetonka. Any discussions or action <br /> r.tust certainly also take into consideration the <br /> complexities of Orono and Lake Minnetonka Conservation <br /> District regulations combined with those of the <br /> DNR and our own interests. <br /> For these reasons, a formal reply shall be forthcoming <br /> within a short time as soon as these interrelati�anships <br /> can be more clearly sorted. The recent, sudden <br /> thrust of DNR into our situation just demands more <br /> ;ime to evaluate. <br /> (Continued) <br />