04-13-1978 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.. Page 27 . ' ��.�.�, R�, �� 4��;�, ��. e�.�� .�� .2335 �k/. `1�.+�i �/I��ituas� 36 Orro G. Bonet�roo, P.E. Laxrencc F. Fddsien, P.E. �� nQ� ��/fitP64iQ� 55„3 Ra6c�t iV. Rosene, P.E. Glenn R. Cook. P.E. loseph C. Anderlik, P.E. Kclth A. Go.don, P.£. / B�adford A. Lem berg, P.E. Thomat E. Nayts, P.E. nifOKC: 636-�600 Robn�D. Frigaard, P.E. Rfchard 1V. Fos�n, P.E. Richard E. 7urno, P.E. Robe��G. Schuntch4 P.E. James C. Olson, P.£. bfarvin L. Sorvola, P.E. Donald C. Burga�dl, P.E. A ri1 l� 19.IH Xenne7h R. Meialci, P.E. P � Charles A. ErickJon Leo M. Paw�rlsky Xa�lan M. Olson Ptr. P.obert Mazanec Senior Planner • Metropolitan Council 300 Pietro Square Building St. Paul, riinnesota 55101 Re : Orono-Long Lake Interceptor Our File No. 139 Dear Mr. Mazanec : The letter dated March 31, 1978, from John Boland to Mayor VanNest fairly represents the items discussed and the understandings reached between the riayor of Orono, the rnace Staff and the Council Staff at the meetings of March 27 and March 30 at the Metropolitan Council offices. The City of Orono's support of the Orono-Long Lake facility, prior to actually relocating the I�NSA line and the MSSR line is a policy ques- tion to be resolved by the Orono City Council. The Orono Council will be considering this matter in the very near future. Our firm has been directed by the City of Orono to prepare an interim CSP, to the year 1980, as discussed at the March 30 meeting. We under- stand that your office will be forwarding a set of guidelines to use ' _ in the preparation of the ir.terim CSP. In order to assist in the , preparation of the interim CSP and to aid the City Council in the eval- uation of the policy decision to support the Orono-Long Lake Interceptor, we have been requested to seek clarification of several specific items, as follows : 1) What is the correct amount of the ultimate capacity of the Oron�-Long Lake Interceptor? The revised System Statement, Page 19, lists the ultimate average daily flow at 1.71 i�IGD. Addend�n No. 3, revised Table 10 of the Preliminary Engineering Report in- dicates 1.77 MGD. 2) What is the correct amount of the Ultimate design flow from Orono� The revised System Statement, Page 19, lists the amount at 1.09 MGD. Addendum No. 3, revised Table 10, indicates 1 .14 MGD. Page 1. .