Laserfiche WebLink
•' ' - � Telrphonr 4737357 <br /> . .• Page 39 <br /> ���� � � �1 <br /> " �`��� • �U� J� J� �9� ����.1��� <br /> . 1�_^� : <br /> - Pust Office Box 60•Crystal Bay, Minnecota 5�323•'�4unicipal U.fices <br /> '.'�:--=r. :- , . <br /> .���F���_ . . <br /> - � On the I!'orth Stiore of Lake ll7innetorka <br /> _ 'a?� - :� <br /> ^.�•' y�.. �.,_. <br /> � � <br /> ������_C� <br /> � <br /> �_--=t:. <br /> P�arch 23, 1978 <br /> P9r. Bernard J. Tiarrington � <br /> • P�Setropolitan <<'aste Control Commission <br /> 350 Metro Square Building <br /> 7th & Robert Streets � <br /> St. Paul, P•4innesota 55101 - - <br /> • Dear, Mr. .Harrington: <br /> This letter is in response to your letter of Piarch 15, 1978, <br /> concerning the Orono-Long Lake interceptor as presently proposed <br /> for the City of Orono. - <br /> The cor.iments made in the last paragraph of vour letter of March 15 <br /> indicate that the ��'aste Control Commission has provic3ed answers <br /> to questions raised by the City of Orono pertaining to the sewer <br /> service area of the Orono-Long Lake interce�tor. The Waste Control <br /> Corimission has no� safisfactorily answered the question that the <br /> City of Orono has raised concerning the future capacity of the <br /> forcemain _ for that part of the sewer service area which lies out- <br /> side of the proposed MUSA line and in the rural service area_ '?'he <br /> � information contained in your letter of Idarch 1, 1978 does give us <br /> the capacity of the lift stations which are designed to handle the <br /> � projected flow from that portion of Orono which lies within the <br /> urban 'service area_ We have compared the flows and population <br /> equivalents for the li�t stations contained in your letter of March 1. <br /> with Addendum �3 of the Engineering Report and the Orono Comprehensive <br /> Sewer Plan and they seem to be consistent. In other words, the <br /> projected flows of the lift station would .seem to provide a reasonable <br /> capacity for a twenty-year period f�r that part of the City of Orono <br /> which lies within the urban service area. <br /> The question which the City has raised, which the S7aste Control <br /> Commission has not provided an answer, is what is the future caoacity <br /> and the population equivalents of the forcemain for that portion <br /> of the sewer service area which lies within the rural service area <br /> of the City of Orono_ In other words, the City wishes to know what <br /> level of urbanization has been projected b_y the Waste Control <br /> ' Commission in the sizing of the forcemain to serve that portion of <br /> the sewer service area that lies in the rural service area of our <br /> City. <br /> � <br />