My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-16-1978 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1978
>
03-16-1978 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2015 3:43:08 PM
Creation date
4/21/2015 3:42:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� RE�ULAR P2EETING OF THE ORONO COUP7CIL, PSARCH 16, 1978 Page 9 <br /> jti'AL1ER' S PORT <br /> (Continued) <br /> applicants haYe ar will proVide the Council with sufficient data and advice <br /> from their engineers to enable the Council to �etermine whether the proposed <br /> plans would detrimentally affect the health, safety or welfare of the public, <br /> it being the Council 's primary duty to protect these public, rather than private, <br /> interests. <br /> Hov;ever, with regard to the assertion of <br /> the opponents that the applicants lack the necessary property right to rrake the <br /> proposed improvements as individuals, I feel that my client's position should <br /> be stated for the benefit of the Council . Before cor�enting on the substantive <br /> issues thus raised, I should note that it is my understanding that the Council <br /> has placed the burden of establishing this objection upon the opponents. That <br /> is, I assume that unless the opponents affirmatively demonstrate that the <br /> necessary property rights are absent, the Council will treat the individuals <br /> as the proper applicants and proceed to act upon the merits of the pending <br /> applications. � <br /> As the Council is aware, all of the property <br /> in Walters Port is subject to a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants dated <br /> February 6, 1961 . To my knowledge, the validity and binding effect of these <br /> covenants have never been questioned and I have advised my client that these <br /> are enforceable restrictions with which his use of his property must comply. <br /> However, to simply state that these are enforceable covenants does not answer <br /> the question before the Council . The covenants themselves must be scrutinized <br /> to determine their meaning and intent, far it would be a serious mistake for the <br /> Council to adopt a conclusory interpretation urged by individuals, none of whom <br /> were parties to the original declaration. <br /> Paragraph 10 of the covenants gives each <br /> lot owner in Walters Port a non-exclusive easement in and over Outlot 3 and 4 <br /> for use as a boat harbor. The paragraph contains certain restrictions on the <br /> use of the harbor and on construction of boat docks, but it does not address the <br /> , question of maintenance of the easement area. Paragraph 8, however, states as <br /> follows: <br /> The owners of each and every lot in said subdivision are by their <br /> ownership made members of the Walters-Port Improvement and t�ain- <br /> tenance Association. The members of this association shall be <br /> financially responsible for the maintenance, preservation and <br /> improvement of the boat harbor and channel to the lake located on <br /> Outlot 3 and 4 of said subdivision. The members of this association <br /> shall also be financially responsible for the maintenance, preser- <br /> vation and improvement of the road located on Outlot 1 , of said <br /> subdivision after said road has been surfaced by William R. k'alters. <br /> Each association member shall have a vote in any matters pertaining <br /> (Continued) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.