Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> � � perQE' 73 <br /> .�i. . , '. __"G �1 . ,..-, _-_; . _�C'i7 <br /> :;:� : ::) � � 1 �'7$ I <br /> i��- :�' 2 � <br /> '��iG' O1'G7�0 CGUriCll i��IS �}-iat �rTl i"iO�i�t;S 1S 3 Sliii1Cl��Ii� �i'iGll1l� Of <br /> ti�-�e ior �i�e t•:asi�e Con�.iol Co:�-�ission to rcvicw a Co;�>>rehr_-nsive �lan <br /> iha� nzs nrcn sui�mitted for approval , particularlv in light of the <br /> fact tna� �he plan orioinally sub;�itt�d in Octobcr of 1976 and for <br /> th� ncxt iive-non�h period, tne City r,�ooti�atcd with tne T;etropoli �an . <br /> Council s�aff and �re f•;as�e Con�i-ol Co�:���ission s�aff to reach a iinal � <br /> �orFr-r��nt on �}�is pl�n in 1'arcn of 1�77; tn� n)_an ::�as ti-��:n �����nd��d I <br /> in �pril c�f 1977, and a favorable revi�w by tne P;etroi�oli�an Counci 1 � <br /> staff ��:as draf�ed and s�bmitted to t�� Physicial ��velop���ent Co;�-r�it��ee <br /> in June of 1977. It ti�as at this nceting that �he T•:as�e Control � <br /> Co:����ission objected io c�anaing the 1hi'SA line wi�nin Grono, �.anich ' <br /> resul��d in t�,e review b-ing tablFd �nd no ac�ion h�s ta'r,r_=n place � <br /> since that ti,:�e. �ine Ci�y respectiully reauc�s�s, �nat ��e �•:as�e <br /> Control Cor�u-�ission continue Lhe revie�•� process and grant us an approval � <br /> witnin �he very near future. � , ( <br /> During our r�ee-ting of FebrLary 2 , 1978, it beca�:�e clear �o us �nat �_ne � <br /> � <br /> Orono inLerceptor h�;d additional capaciLy b�yoJ�d �ha� wnich �•�as shown j <br /> in �he Orono Co,:�prehensive Sewer Plan and in Addenduri �3 of tne <br /> Engineering Report. T�is was confirned -co us wit� a co�r�-nitment that <br /> we would be told what �_hat capacity t�Jas and �ahat area within the City <br /> of Orono it was �o ser �e. The in�or,nation contained in your letter <br /> �f L'arch 1, 1978, sho��s the average flo:,�s only for the liit stations <br /> �ahich do re�lect in=or;+ation fror.i our Comprehensive Sewer Plan and <br /> Addenduin �3 to the Fngineering Report_ You have indicated that there � <br /> is approaimately an additional seventeen percent increase in the <br /> capacity of -the interceptor in the event a third pump were to be installed <br /> at the lift station. <br /> T:e have subr_�i�ted �his inforr,�at3on to our City Fngi�eer for review and , <br /> . recor.unendation i�ut it appears to me -that you have not responded �.o <br /> our basic question of "is there any additional hydraulic capacity designed <br /> into the force nain of the Orono interceptor?" If there is additional <br /> capacity beyond the bresent lift station even with �he addition of <br /> a third pur�p, the Citv would like �o know wha�t t�at additional capacity <br /> is and how you have .arrived at the service area wiLhin the Ci�y of <br /> Orono -that it is to serve. In looking at the se�ver service area map <br /> provioed �1ith your letter of P�iarch l, it becomes apparent that the <br /> Orono intercep�or is designed to serve all of Orono, including that <br /> por�ion which is consioered in the rural service area. Either you . <br /> have d?sioned �he iorce riain to serve rural Orono or �he sewer service <br /> area r„�p is incorrecLly arawn inc�uding rural Orono, whic� is not Lo <br /> be �aithin the se��er service area_ The Ci�y of Orono nust have answers . <br /> to these auestions before it can support the consLruction of the Orono i <br /> intercepLor. The City feels it is enti-tled �o this inforr-�a�ion and i <br /> it has repea�edly as}.ed ��ese qu�stions �Vnich have not been adec�ua-�ely � <br /> ans::ered. � . <br /> � � <br /> � � <br /> � <br /> i <br /> � , <br /> � � <br />