Laserfiche WebLink
� � - vace 32 <br /> . � � �� m - � -� <br /> .:�� / FE3 �I ==�- <br /> � � E�� � '��' � <br /> � <br /> • VIL���t G� C:c�; :�� <br /> 1 Mr. Brad VanNest - 2 18 February 1978 . <br /> would be a 20-26$ increase of shoreline at �he water 1eve1 � � - - <br /> . and 39-54$ increase of shoreline frontage at the normal - - - <br /> 1 established property elevation levels for the Ellis and Crist - <br /> ` properties. . These two properties are the only ones to gairi <br /> : -. added footage by this, the DeGregory property is unaffected. � -- <br /> ; � We do not endorse any, "manufacturing of more lakeshore" for <br /> � whatever reasons. _ � <br /> � � S. - Quantative anal sis Ta ' - - . _ . - - , - - - <br /> , y ( ble 2 j furtherrnore shows that any - _ - <br /> such undertaking would be more than a "grading job" as remarked <br /> during the last council .meeting. Substantial shoreline � � � = _ - <br /> � _ � - a�.teration and dredging is potentially involved, some 280 cu/yds �_:�,- �.�" <br /> � - _ -of earth (1/3 below water level) would have to be bulidozed . -- - '�'``� <br /> � =;r"��. <br /> � . and reruoved, and an estirr�ted 567 tons of boulders would be - " � <br /> - • required on the basis of a 2-1/2:1 slope. - � .. - : - <br /> � _ � fi_ We are prepared �o vigorously defend -at a11 government and -=� = " <br /> _ - agency°�evels our •reparian rights, our �xisting rights,� � - - = _ <br /> obligations and responsibiiities per the covenants attached to - - - <br /> _ our deeds. - - � - - <br /> _ _ �Te support the following:= - � - _ . - _ - - <br /> -� _ - . . . _ _ -. - - . _ - _ , : _ <br /> � .-_:�i. To maintain,-_ repair,� improve and rebuild the existi�g - .- <br /> - � - -seawall, per existing permits and per obligations under the " = <br /> . covenants. ;221 feet are completed.) - _ - -- <br /> . _ - - - - - - - - - _ _ � _ .- __�_- <br />� _ 2. To proceed timely fln the required remaining work to assure = _T:�-'_-� <br /> - . - a safe access by all owners to the lake by springtime and - -�'� - -- - <br /> � possibly avoid actions and shut-down of the lagoon by 7oca1 _ . - ._� - <br /> governments who could declare the -lagoon entry unsafe if the - - - � <br /> structural repair _is not carried out. - - <br /> 3. To preserve and to keep the established property lines <br /> � and frontages as per plats and deeds. � _- <br /> 4. To maintain a cohesive uniform seawall design as much as <br /> possible and practical in view of the relatively small and <br /> confined lagoon area. _ <br /> � <br /> - 5. To preserve the existing remaining small wetlands area . <br /> which directly abuts most of the 340 ft. west wall. <br />