#6660-variances-2016 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

��o CITY �F �RONQ RESOLUTION OF'FHE CITY COUNCIL �� e'� rro. 6 6 6 0 �k SH09`� A2. The Property is locazsd witban the RR 1B Single Family Rural Residential District which requires a minimwm lot area of 2.0 acres and a minimum lot wicith of 200' for conslruction of a singf e family residence. A3. The Property is 0.62 acres in area, being 180 feet in defiaed width. The property is considered as legally nonconforming with regazd to lot area and lot width. A4. The property is located within Stonm Water Quality Overlay District Tier 1 which allows 25% hazdcover. The proposed residence additions will result in total hardcover on the pmperty of 4,212 s.f.or appro�cimately 15.7%,well below the maximum overall hardcover allowaa�ce for the Properly. Hardcover within the 0-75' zone where no hardcover is normally allowed is I,Q70 s.f. A5. The applicants are proposing to reconfigure an exi.s�g deck into a covered deck with storage below, on the east side of the residence. The property abuts the creek that flows fiom Lake Classen to Stubbs Bay wluch is a protectsd tributary and subject to a 75' structure setback as well as the standard limitatians on hardcover in the 0-75' zoae. Portions of the �ist�ag house, deck and patio are within 75' of the creek shoreline,which normally exasts act approximately the 960'contour,fluctuations being controlled by the dam further south just east of Leaf Street.. A6. The exisbng house is two levels with a flat roof,and the proposed deck area roconfiguration will retain that stylin$, The construction will be occurring almost ernirely aver existing patio, deck or driveway hardcover, and no hardcover increase is pmposod. The additional superstruchue of storage area enclosure and deck mof constitute aew stcvctu�e within 75' of the shoreline,requirimg a variancs for hardcovcr conversion and stcucture within 75' of the creek A7. T1ne proposai to r�place the existing deck in its existing footprint, add a roof over it, and create enclosed storage under it, will not increase hardcover from the existing levels. Existing and proposed hardcover at just under 16%is w+ell below the 25%threahold for the site,and no additional hardcover is being added in the 0-75' zone, so runoff from the site is not expected to increase. A8. The only new structure footprint proposed is the 4' extensian of the deck southward and the stairway leading to the driveway. This constitutes 46 s.f.of added sf�vctural hardcover in the 0-75' zone, while overall structural coverage on the lot will still be at o�nly 5.5%, well below the 15%Iimit. A9. The praposed roof over the reconfigured deck will provide functionality while enbancing the architectural styling of the existing residence. Because the proposed deck roof is well below the 30'height limit,it is not expected to be visually int,rusive from off-site. 2