01-09-1978 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• ; R�GULAR T�iEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JAZIUARY 9, 1978 Page 11 Psr. Greg Frank commented that he will be RING ROUTE discussing these comments with .Fiennepin County (Continued) within the next week and will draft a letter to the City Council before the next meeting. Mr. Greg Frank reviewed funding for the proposed ring route commenting that the City is in receipt of a balance of P7SA funds available, which states : Page 12 Mr. Frank continued by stating that the $385, 309. 35 PiSA balance can be used to pay toward the construction costs of the ring route project and 500 of any future MSA monies can be �ised to retire the bonds used to fund the balance. Orono receives approximately $80, 000 , one year, $40,000 may be used each year to retire the bonding of the project. P'iayor V`an Nest comr,iented that the City is in receipt METROPOLITAN WASTE CONT� of a letter from r4r. II. J. Harrington of the 24etropolitan Waste Control Commission which is not in ac�reement with past correspondence v�ith the ��i�)CC. I would want to discuss this matter later in the evening when P'ir. Bonestroo arrives. tsayor Van Nest reviewed with PZr. Emmings , Psr. IIork' s NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARIN� attorney, the agreement reached last fall for FENCIrdG installing a fence, which states: "This authorization is given provided that land- scaping and installation of shrubberv reflected in Exhibit B, and other screening measures as may be reasonably required by the City of Orono be implemented as soon as is reasonably practicable but in any event the required screening must be commenced by September 15, 1977 and completed by October 15, 1977, if at all possible. Hork shall use his best efforts to install the required fencing immediately and in any event shall commence installation by September 15, 1977 and conplete installation by September 30 , 1977, if at all possible. It is understood that the fencing is the primary screening device and that shrubbery will be secondary, i.e. will be rec�uired where the fence does an incomplete job of screening. The fence shall be opaque, made of wood or some other material meeting the approval of the City building inspector, and shall be ten feet in height along the side lot lines and six feet in height along the front lot line. In the case of adjoining landowners who, for various reasons , do not want the fence installed, the City shall make the final detez-r.iination of whether a fence shall be rec�uired. " (Continued)