My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1977 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1977
>
12-12-1977 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2015 3:03:01 PM
Creation date
4/21/2015 3:02:53 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � . . <br /> � �EGULAR NiEETING OF THE OROP�O COUNCIL, DECEPZBER 12, 1977 Page 33 <br /> � T11e enclosed survey indicates the existing location VARIANCE <br /> � of a boat house near the shoreline. This is a 2515 Kelly Avenue <br /> masonry structure with a reinforced concrete flat (Continued) <br /> � roof currently used as a deck. <br /> (, The Gustafsons are requesting approval of a ' <br /> variance to erect an enclosed structure on top <br /> � of this existing foundation and reinforced deck. <br /> • The new addition would not increase the hardcover <br /> area as it would only extend upward. <br /> � Planning Commission Work Session - November 21, 1977 <br /> � <br /> Reviewed proposal - discussion included existing <br /> � reinforced slab hardcover and height limitations. <br /> � Planning Cor.imission P�4eeting - December 5, 1977 <br /> � P�r. Gustafson was present. After brief discussion, <br /> ,A a motion was made to recommend denial of application. <br /> Three Members voted in favor of denial and four <br /> r abstained. <br /> � iiore discussion followed. Several pertinent <br /> issues were brought out. <br /> � l. D.N.R, regulations in 4�Iisconsin prohibit repair <br /> or expansion of existing non-conforr.�ing situations <br /> ` which do not comply with the current shoreline <br /> regulations. <br /> r <br /> 2. Setting of precedent on somewhat similar non- <br /> � conforming situations (existing slabs along <br /> * shoreline) . <br /> � 3. Visual obstruction. <br /> � Commission elected to reconsider proposal. Planning <br /> Coruni.ssion recommended denial of variance. Five <br /> r voted in favor of denial and two abstained. <br /> � Council P�Zeeting - December 1?, 1977 <br /> � iir. Gustafson was present to discuss his proposal <br /> ' co < < enting that he would propose a temporary <br /> rather than a permanent structure if this would <br /> � be riore in line with City codes. <br /> • P�ayor Van Nest stated this proposal will increase <br /> , the bulk of the structure and is an expansion of <br /> non-conforming uses which is not allowed in our <br /> ' code and is not in conformance with D.Td.R. <br /> regulations. (Continued) <br /> � <br /> 7 <br /> � <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.