Laserfiche WebLink
?,'.r . John G�•r}}:�rdsun <br /> ` '��rc�mbcr 10, 19i7 _ <br /> � Pa�c 'fhree Page 36 <br /> � lf cur.rc�nt collst�r:�ption patterns ���ere to coiitinue after <br /> acic,l,i. i ng the proposal , a f lat rate char�;e of $0. 90 l�er thousa�id <br /> �;allons �ti�ould Ue adequate without a minimum quarterly ch�r�;e . Then <br /> low volume users could e�pect an even smaller �ti�ater bill . � �tie � <br /> disctissed the possiUility of eli�ninat� n� the minimtim char�;e or <br /> reduce the r.�inimum char�;e Uy �n arnount �reater than that ��roposed. <br /> lion�ever, if the large voluine users �vere to reduce consumption, the <br /> �ciditional revenues associated �vith a r�inirnum char�;e are necessary . <br /> S It ���ould seem rnore prudent to mai�itain a miiiimum rate for si���ll users <br /> similar to the existin� rate with the philosophy that �_f revenues <br /> in the next y�ar are ample, the minimum rate could be reduced or <br /> eliminated. To reduce the �niniinura rate a sib�iifica�lt arnount at <br /> this time only to discover next year that it has to L-e raised abain <br /> «�ould not be advisable. <br /> As a final recor��nendation, �ce suggest that Orono review the <br /> rate structure on an annual basis. <br /> If you have a�ly questions, please advise. <br /> V�ry truly �-ours, <br /> • 1�1c0C)?�iBS-hNUTSON ASSOCIATFS, INC. <br /> V <br /> Gre or Frank, P . E. <br /> GF: jl <br /> o ' <br /> � <br /> . <br /> � <br /> .. .. .. . • ., . � � <br />