My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-1977 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1977
>
11-14-1977 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2015 2:53:49 PM
Creation date
4/21/2015 2:53:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> • hi:GULI�R i1EETING OF TIiE OROPJO COliP1CIL, PIO�'E"1I3ER 14 , 1977 Page 15 <br /> � i�1r. 711an Olson, Assistant Building & 7oning SUBDIVISIOPI <br /> I�c31��inistrator, entered into the, record the 4470 & 4480 I'orest Lak <br /> �f_ollowing information concerning a subdivision Landing <br /> request of Bernhard Reiling (Lou Oberhauser) - ##324 <br /> ` 4470 & 4480 Forest Lake Landing, dated October 13, I3ernhard Reiling <br /> ! 1977, which states : <br /> Lots �3 & 9 , as currently platted, are occupied <br /> by t��o residences. One residence is located on <br /> � the lot line. Both properties ��ere previously <br /> �c�med by Bernhard Reiling. �aithin the past three <br /> � years , the Halms purchased, under a contract for <br /> � deed, the residence to the south with a meets <br /> and bounds description of the land. The Johnsons <br /> � have purchased the property to the north under a <br /> sir�ilar agreement. <br /> w <br /> Th� purchasers have recently considered fulfilling <br /> � the contract but learned that the parcels as <br /> • described are not recorded with the County. There- <br /> fore, neither property has clear title and all <br /> � parties involved are having problems. P�r. Oberhauser, <br /> representing P4r. Reiling, has subrlitted an application <br /> � for subdividing these properties so both titles <br /> can be cleared and all parties satisf_ied. <br /> f <br /> Combining these lots would only result in two <br /> �residences on one parcel. Although the proposed <br /> ! rearrangerient is in conflict with our Policies <br /> and ordinances, it appears to be the best solution. <br /> « I want to call your attention to another situation <br /> � which currently exists in this same area. Lot 7 <br /> (also substandard) is located adjacent to Lot 8. <br /> • Lot 7 is also occupied by a structure which appears <br /> � vacant. SoMe renovation or restoration might be <br /> necessary if it were to be used as a residence. I <br /> , have received some inquiries from parties if the <br /> structure could be purchased and r.►oved to other <br /> � locations as a garage. I caas also asked about <br /> City policy regarding ter.lporary residence in this <br /> r structure during construction of a new residence. <br /> I somewhat sense that I caill be approached in <br /> S the near future about the possibilities of obtain- <br /> ing a variance to build a new residence on this <br /> � substandard Lot 7. I believe we should address <br /> • the issue. I have been informed that Lot 7 is <br /> currently owned by either a son or daughter o_f <br /> � the Ilalr.ls. <br /> � I have forwarded copies of the proposed rearrange- <br /> ment along with request for cor.�u:�ents to the City <br /> � 1ldministrator, City Attorney, City Enc�ineer, and <br /> � �ity Public �•7orks Coordinator. (Continued) <br /> r <br /> � <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.