Laserfiche WebLink
� • � <br /> R�GULAR l4EETING OF' mFi� OROtdO COUtdCIL, OCTOBER 7.4, 1977 Page 3 <br /> Side yard setback variances would also be necessarv VARIANCE <br /> as the required setback is 3D ft. and the pronosed 341 t•�estlake Street <br /> � garage would be onlv 4. 5 ft. and 21. 5 �t. f_rom the (Continued) <br /> two side lot lines.+ Pdecessarv setback variances: <br /> 25. 5 ft. and 8. 5 f t. � <br /> A variance from the required distance between <br /> � structures would also be necessary. Our ordinance <br /> requires a distance of 10 ft. between structures. <br /> The proposed location is only 5 ft. from the <br /> existing home. To locate the pronosed garage per <br /> code, it would necessitate extensive removal of <br /> nunlerous trees and bushes. I have alreadv infor-ried <br /> the applicant that if this variance were granted, <br /> � the garage would have to be treated like an attached <br /> garage. The State Building Code requires fire <br /> code sheet rock on the wall nearest the residence <br /> for safety from fire. The applicant assured me <br /> he would comply. The property to the south (Lots 7 & <br /> 19) is combined and is now occupied by a house. The <br /> pronerty to the north (Lots 4 & 5) is combined and <br /> previously was occupied by a residence which was <br /> destroyed by fire several years ago. <br /> The data presented indicates the three separate <br /> parcels have been under single separate o�•�nership <br /> since before 1967. <br /> Planning Cominission Lieeting - Octoher 17, 1977 <br /> 2Sr. Doty and neighbor residing on adjoining <br /> propertj� to the south (rRr. Anderson) were present. <br /> Recorunended approval of variances. <br /> Justifications: <br /> 1. Subject property and adjacent properties to <br /> � the north and south are all under single <br /> separate ownership. <br /> 2. P10 other land available. <br /> 3. Proposed location is somewhat of a continuation <br /> Z of a line of existing side yard setbacks. <br /> 4. td�ighbor residing on property to the south (John <br /> Anderson) voiced no objection. <br /> Conditions: <br /> 1. Applicant recongnizes the fact that Planning <br /> Commission called to his attention the ir.iportance <br /> �' of applicant' s providing some protection �rom <br /> erosion and falling trees. <br /> 2. Provide necessary fire wall construction on garage <br /> walls facing residence to �rotect ac�ainst fire <br /> spreading to house (treat as attached garage) . (Continued) <br />