Laserfiche WebLink
� , , <br /> � REGULAR PiEETiI3G OI' '?'HE ORONO COUtJCIL, OCTOBI:R 24, 1977 Page 11 <br /> � Mr. Cargill comr.'iented that he is not in favor of DOCK PROPOSAL <br /> disturbing the preGent natural marshland to create 500 North Arm Drive <br /> �duck ponds. � (Continued) <br /> � Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to instruct staff <br /> to request the Department of Natural Resources to <br /> � respond to the City by November 1, 1977, to review <br /> • the environmental ir.ipact of dredging duck ponds, and <br /> instructed staff to redraft the resolution. �4otion, <br /> � Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> � <br /> � Ma;�or Van Nest reviewed previous Council action VARIANCE <br /> concerning Piir. Jack Rhode' s a�plication for a 1410 Bohn' s Point Road <br /> � variance to the lot area and width for his proposed #210 <br /> residence at 1410 Bohn` s Point Road. mhe t4ayor Jack Rhode <br /> � reviewed the exhibits that have been presented <br /> which are: <br /> � <br /> 1. Exhibit A - Original subdivision <br /> � 2. Exhibit B - Building permit issued to rred <br /> � Rogers and John rullickson on June 26, 1968, <br /> for new home at 3125 North Shore Drive. This <br /> � is the current Becker residence. <br /> 3. Exhibit C - Survey indicating proposed lagoon <br /> � setback as approximately 58 ft. <br /> * 4. Exhibit D - Council minutes of August 13, 1973, <br /> granting apnroval of house location f_or Duane <br /> � Hoff at 3135 Plorth Shore Drive, lot immediately <br /> east of Becker property. <br /> � (Note on Exhibits E & F, lagoon setback is 60 ' ) <br /> 5. Exhibit E - Building permit for Hoff at 3135 ilorth <br /> ` Shore Drive (lagoon setback 60' ) <br /> 6. Exhibit F - Only site sketch on file for house <br /> � at 3135 PZorth Shore Drive. Note - not a certif_ied <br /> • survey and does not indicate proposed location_ <br /> 7. Exhibit G - 1960 aerial of area. (Note - no docks <br /> � on subject lot) . <br /> 8. �xhibit H - 1975 aerial of area. (Note - no docks <br /> � on subject lot) . <br /> 9. Exhibit I - max record for subject lot (Rhode' s <br /> � property) . 2dote - June 30, 1969, property was <br /> assessed for residence. Evidentl_y, platted as <br /> �' residential site and not as an outlot. <br /> � Findings of fact have been presented which are <br /> � documented and are part of the record. The Citv <br /> Council should address themselves to: <br /> � <br /> 1. Is this a buildahle lot? <br /> � 2. If buildable, should existing barn be allowed <br /> to remain? <br /> � 3. Review all setback requirements <br /> �4. Should multi-use dock be allowed? <br /> 5. Final resolution should be draf_ted f_or Council <br /> � review at their next meeting. (Continued) <br /> ♦ <br /> � <br />