Revised Plan Review - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i ' From:TIM Carver[mailto:tim0531truction@�mail.coml Sent:Wednesday, February 15, 2017 5:04 PM � To: Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> ; Subject: 1565 Fairview Cottage Lane '; Roger, ;, I just want to clarify, we we working with updated drawings during the concrete foundation and the framing ',, processes. The plans were turned in by the homeowner for the building permit originally. I got involved after °: that and thought she had turned in an updated set to you but I discovered she thought I or the architect were : doing it. Hence the reason I brought in updated sets once I figured that out. My apologies for the delay. iii I met with the concrete contractor and have attached photos to show evidence that the footings do I accommodate the increase for the steel beam loads, based on the revised drawings you have for � consideration. He was working with prints dated Oct 20, which had the revision to add the steel beam with � increased footing size. The prints you have updated the garage header to a 3x 18" LVL and a few other small ' changes to window size/location, in addition to the steel beam, I believe. ' He recalls having depths of 12". The footing on the right side was 54" wide the entire length to the corner for '1 ease of pour, which the photo shows. More than the 36" x 36" called out on the print. `- The footing on the left side of large garage door also looks to be squared up and approximately 48"x48" based on his recollection but the attached photo only shows the front side. I do not have a photo so show the inside ;'�; of that corner. � ''. Please let me know what more you need to approve the revision. ' We will be calling for a framing inspection just as soon as you finalize the revision approval. Garage floor slab has not been poured, nor will it be till after road restrictions. ' Thank you for your patience while I was getting the photos together and meeting with concrete contractor. � Tim 3