Laserfiche WebLink
� , � <br /> � RI:GULAR P1F,ETING OF THE ORONO COUNCZL, SEP`1'Et1I3ER 26 , 1977 Page 7 <br /> � There are no wetlands on the property. There SUBDIVISION <br /> is an existing access drive on Lot 2. I�ny new 2140 Sixth Avenue North <br /> drive onto Lot 1 would require County permit. (Continued) <br /> � A park dedication fee should be required for this <br /> division. A public hearing has been scheduled <br /> � for September 19 , 1977, at 7 : 30 P.M. <br /> � Planning Commission l��eeting - Sept�mber 19 , 1977 <br /> Neighbor to west concerned about his well located <br /> close to property line and also concern if horses <br /> � would be allowed. Because horses require a <br /> � r��inirnur�l of three acres in this zone, a variance <br /> and conditional use perrnit would be required by <br /> � separate application. He was also concerned with <br /> actual survey line and with hill and access to <br /> � Lot l. An easement may be required over Lot 2 to <br /> conbine accesses. A drainage plan should be <br /> • subnitted to ensure proper drainage to the property <br /> � to the west. No County reply on access to date. <br /> Reconr��ended preliminary approval subject to County <br /> � access approval, drainage easement or plan, and <br /> park dedication fee. <br /> • <br /> Mayor Van Nest r:ioved, P2assengale seconded, to approve <br /> � tlie preliminary subdivision request of Donald Eckstrom, <br /> 2140 Sixth Avenue North, subject to: <br /> � <br /> Coru�on access for Lots 1 & 2 <br /> 2 . Adequate drainage easements <br /> � 3. Hennepin County access approval <br /> 4. City Engineer review <br /> � 5. Park dedication fee being paid <br /> � P-iotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> • idr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning VARIANCE <br /> Adriinistrator, entered into the record the 3465 Shoreline Drive <br /> � following memo concerning a sign location #300 <br /> variance for Pic A Pop, 3465 Shoreline Drive, Pic A Pop <br /> � dated August 22, 1977, which states : <br /> � Applicant requests a variance to place a new <br /> • 4 ft. X 6 ft. sign atop an existing pylon located <br /> 35 ft. from the County road centerline (2 ft. <br /> � inside the property line) . The sign as proposed <br /> would extend over the right of way by approximately <br /> � 12 inches, which is less than the 6 ft. plus <br /> projection of the existing sign. <br /> � <br /> I am enclosing a copy of the memo ior Item �257 <br /> � which involved a very similar request for a sign <br /> �ariance at Christy Realty next door to this shop. <br /> (Continued) <br /> � <br /> � � <br /> i <br />