Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � REGULAR r4EETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, AUGUST 8 , 1977 Page 9 <br /> • Henry P�uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, read VARIANCE <br /> into the record the following informa�ion concerning 1410 Bohn' s Point Road <br /> ! a variance request of Jack Rhode, 1410 Bohn ' s Point #210 <br /> � Road, dated April 12 , 1977, which states : Jack Rhode <br /> � P�4r. Rhode has submitted a revised proposal and <br /> site plan including the adjoining properties <br /> � with house locations. He is still requesting <br /> the use of the existing structure. I am enclosing <br /> � copies of this revised proposal and plan. <br /> � I checked the site again and feel the proposed <br /> � location of the house may be a little too far <br /> forward than necessary. I also believe that <br /> � moving the house location back to the 30 ' setback <br /> line would result in an encroachment on the <br /> � Lauers to the west. <br /> � It might be best to compromise and locate the <br /> • front of the house midway between the proposed <br /> location and the average setback line as shown <br /> + on my sketch "Exhibit A" . <br /> + �9e might also consider sticking to the conditions <br /> set forth by the Council on October 22, 1977, when <br /> � a variance on this lot was first approved. At <br /> • that time, removal of the old garage was one <br /> of the conditions of approval. We could <br /> � require this again. <br /> � Planning Cor.unission P4eeting - P�ay 2 , 1977 <br /> • P4r. Rhode and neighbors, Mr. Becker and Psr. & <br /> Mrs. Lauer were present. Commission indicated <br /> � objection to retain existing carriage house. <br /> • Similar variance approved in 1974 was conditioned <br /> on removal of carriage house - also indicated <br /> ` objection to multiple dock on property. Suggested <br /> one main dock for use of surrounding property <br /> � owners having lake access easement across subject <br /> property (grandfather - legal non-conforming) . <br /> � <br /> Extremely long discussion followed regarding <br /> � location of proposed dwelling. r7ot much <br /> + progress in determining satisfactory location. <br /> The three interested parties could not agree <br /> � on location. <br /> + Planning Commission finally tabled the application <br /> and suggested Mr. Rhode submit another revised <br /> � plan indicating dimensions from lakeshore in <br /> order to determine actual location and eliminate <br /> � any future controversy. <br /> � Mr. Rhode requested deferring action until June 6 , <br /> � 1977, as he was scheduled to be out of town at <br /> the time of our next scheduled meeting. Notices <br /> e of ineeting would be sent to all interested parties. <br /> � (Continued) <br />