Laserfiche WebLink
� ' + <br /> � REGULI�R P'lEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, AUGUST 8 , 1977 Page 3 <br /> � Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARINA <br /> i.nformed the City Council of the following 3222 North Shore Drive <br /> �nformation for the meeting of August 8 , 1977 #235 <br /> � ncluded Resolution #806 , A Resolution Denying Larry Iiork <br /> Larry Hork,d/b/a North Shore Drive P'Iarina, <br /> � Authority To Erect Two Dry Stack Boat Storage <br /> Units; Stipulation for Settlement, July 29 , 1977; <br /> � addendum letter from A. P. Olson, Assistant <br /> Building & Zoning Administrator, to Larry Hork, <br /> � August 3, 1977; irrevocable bond for $5, 000 per <br /> � stipulation; and the City Engineer' s structural <br /> plan review. <br /> � r�r. Muhich also stated that the negotiation by <br /> � Council and staff over terms of possible litigation <br /> settlement resulted in the Stipulation for <br /> � Settlement which was agreed upon and signed by <br /> all parties by August 4 , 1977. Following terms <br /> � of the stipulation, the City received a registered <br /> � engineer' s evaluation of the proposed structure. <br /> The plans and evaluation were reviewed by the City <br /> � Engineer and Building Inspector and the desic�n <br /> engineer was contacted for clarification of <br /> � certain details. Upon receipt of the required <br /> bond and based upon the City Engineer' s review, <br /> � building permit #3589 was issued to North Shore <br /> S Drive A4arina on August 4, 1977. <br /> � �etter to Larry Hork from Alan P. O�son, dated <br /> August 3, 1977, attached pages 4 & 5 <br /> � <br /> Letter from Greg Frank, £ity Engineer, dated <br /> r August 4,_ 1977, states: - <br /> r At your request, we phoned, on August 4, 1977, <br />' . Mr. Dave 4�eaver of Jervis B.: �aebb Company, the <br />, . designer of the subject storage rack: _ The purpose _; _. ; <br /> � of the conversation 'was to ascertain from Mr. -" <br /> Weaver - the 'structural iritegrity of t�e rack in <br /> � lieu of the facts that (1) the roof syster.l will <br /> not be allowed in the actual installation, and <br /> � (2) the top section directly supporting the roof <br /> would not be necessary, and (3) the rack support <br /> � shall be 16" diameter footings in lieu of the <br /> � continuous slab as detailed in Mr. Weaver' s drawing. <br /> � r4r. Weaver stated that the third level beam is <br /> unnecessary if the roof structure is not to be <br /> � installed. The structural integrity of the system <br /> will not be impaired if this beam were omitted <br /> � provided that the roof structure is also omitted. <br /> � lso, Mr. [aeaver stated that the footings were <br /> �iesigned for a loading of 3587 pounds per pair, <br /> as detailed in the plans. The 16" diameter footings <br /> � are, in my opinion, adequate to support the design <br /> loadings. <br /> � (Continued) <br /> End of letter <br /> � <br />