My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-1977 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
06-27-1977 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2015 1:31:20 PM
Creation date
4/21/2015 1:31:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> • REGULAR P�ZEETING OF THE ORONO COUP�CIL, JUNE 27 , 1977 Page 8 <br /> � <br /> � P�ayor Van Nest moved, Paurus seconded, to instruct <br /> staff to draft a resolution of denial to erect NORTH SHORE DRIVE MARIr <br /> � racks based on Planning Commission recommendations (Continued) � <br /> of April 18, 1977, which state: <br /> � <br /> 1. Expansion of non-conforming use. <br /> � 2. Currently zoned LR-1C-l. <br /> 3. The stacked storage would create an objection- <br /> � able visual obstruction. <br /> • 4. Racks would require a height variance. <br /> 5. The stacked storage lacks adequate natural <br /> screening from road and lake. <br /> 6. Stacking would provide additional open space <br /> � for request for storage expansion in future. <br /> 7. There is no wa1� to control the number of boats. <br /> � 8. t9ould be setting a precedent for on-land slips <br /> . as our code addresses winter storage, not slips. <br /> � and also Council minutes of June 13, 1977: . - <br /> � l. Exceeds 15 ' in height - limitation of zoning code. <br /> 2. Extension of legal non-conforming use. <br /> � 3. Adverse to Comprehensive Plan. <br /> • 4. Promotion of corunercial use in a residential zone. <br /> 5. Result in diminution in value to surrounding <br /> � homes because of visual impact, additional <br /> traffic noise. <br /> � 6. Structures proposed and the footings already in <br /> the ground, require building permit and variance. <br /> � 7. No application for a variance applied for. <br /> 8. Result in introduction of additional boats into <br /> � congested bay. Applicant is just trying to <br /> • increase number of boats to be placed in the <br /> lake, resulting in an unreasonable use of the <br /> � limited riparian rights and resulting in the <br /> restriction and impairment of the riparian <br /> � rights of all other properties along the bay. <br /> 9. Racks are authentically unacceptable in a <br /> � commercial or residential use district. <br /> 10. Inadequate screening of racks. Result in <br /> � congestion on premises. <br /> , 11. Result in promotion of more traffic from a curb- <br /> cut on the County Road near an already dangerous <br /> � curve in the road. <br /> � Motion, Ayes (4) - P1ays (0) . <br /> � Mr. Douglas stated that you have bought yourself <br /> • a lawsuit and 300 boats. <br /> � ' <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.