Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> • REvULAR MEETING OF THE ORONO COUNCIL, JUNE 13 , 1977 Page 36 <br /> . Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE <br /> r_ead into the record the following request of 185 Bederwood <br /> �andy Fredrickson, 185 Bederwood, for a variance, #268 <br /> ated May 11, 1977: Randy Fredrickson <br /> � <br /> • Variance request to permit addition of three bed- <br /> rooms and an enlarged living room bay to an existing <br /> w home. The contractor applied for a permit without <br /> a survey. He was informed that a survey was <br /> � required and a variance appeared likely. He <br /> returned with a variance application May 10 , 1977, <br /> � and within an hour, a subcontractor had called <br /> for a footing inspection. Inspection was refused <br /> �' and a STOP WORK ORDER was placed on the project. <br /> • The excavation was already completed at that time <br /> with no permit having been issued. �Should the <br /> � variance be approved, the building permit will <br /> be subject to the double fee penalty. <br /> � _ <br /> � l'ariances required: ; <br /> • 34.352 LR-lA Zone <br /> � Lot Area: Required - 2 acres; existing - 28,000 sq, ft. ; variance - 68$ <br /> � Lot 1'�'idth: Required - 200' ; existing - 120' ; variance - 40$ <br /> Rear Setback: Required - 50' ; existing - 20' ; variance - 60$ <br /> � Front Setback: Requir�d - 50' ; ezisting to property line - 65' ; conforming <br /> ezisting to roa�cay - 50' ; conforming <br /> ` �ropesed to property line - 60' ; co�forming <br /> S proposed to roac�aay - 40' ; ��ariance - 20$ <br /> Ha n3ships: no additional land available: travelled access road nins through this lot. <br /> • <br /> � Planning Commission I�ieeting - May 16 , 1977 <br /> ` Approved on work session because of hardships and <br /> that addition would not require setback variances <br /> � and because owner presented letter of approval <br /> S from adjoining neighbors. Al1 neighbors will be <br /> notified by City prior to Council meeting. <br /> � Commission did question the functioning of the <br /> septic system. Applicant said system was working <br /> � without problems, but that he had no idea what kind <br /> of system it is. <br /> • <br /> • Council Meeting - May 23, 19777 <br /> � Deferred action. Instructed applicant submit <br /> necessary borings and design septic system to <br /> � replace current defective system. <br /> fter review and approval of septic design by <br /> ity �ngineer and staff, application would be <br /> brought to Council again for action. <br /> * (Continued) <br /> � <br /> � <br />