Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � R�:Gu�,:av ���:=:�i'ING OF T�iE ORO�O CO�VCLL APUfZ 25 , 19%7 Pag� l� <br /> � Planning Commission P�eetinr - Marcn 21, 1977 SUBUIVISION <br /> � A public hearing was scheduled for April 18, 2�32 Caroline Avenue <br /> � <br /> 1977 at 7: 30 P,M. (Continued) <br /> � Planning Commission Meeting - April 18 , 1977 <br /> � The Planning Commission recommended prelimznary <br /> aoproval on the basis that the subdivision meets <br /> � all the necessary requirements and with the <br /> , unders�anding that if the bigger lot was divided <br /> again, only the lakeshore lot would have access. <br /> � Subject to park dedication fee. <br /> � Staff - Apr_i1 20 , 1977 <br /> � Enctosed is a cooy of report received from City <br /> Engineer. <br /> � <br /> . Council Meeting - Apri1 25 , 1977 <br /> � Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the <br /> preliminary subdivision for Bruce Kobs, 2732 <br /> « Caroline Avenue, subjec� to : <br /> r► l. Park dedication fee being paid. <br /> 2 . Larqer parcel to re�r�ain as one parcel. <br /> � 3 . Of�=-shore lot wi11 not have access to lak�. <br /> w <br /> ��'o�ion, Ayes {3) - N�ys (0) . <br /> � <br /> � Nenry Muhich, Building & Zoning Adminis�rator, SUBDIVISION <br /> read into the recor�.' the following, dated 140 Brown Road South <br /> � M�--ch 31 , 1977 #243 <br /> i James Kallestad <br /> NIr-. Ju�-�� Kallestad, 140 Brown Road South, <br /> � is requ�s�i_ng to divide parcel exceeding <br /> 6 acres into two lots , both of which would <br /> � exceed the 2-acre minimum area. The sq, ft. <br /> areas are nor indicated on the plan. <br /> • <br /> � The proposal inclu.des the pro��osed locaLi_on <br /> o� the- main structure and two accessory structures. <br /> � Tne location for the propos^d tennis court is <br /> only 30 ' from the north lot line, which runs <br /> � z.djacent to the privaLe access road to the V�n <br /> Eeci�hout property. This access might at some <br /> � time in the future become a public raa:d to other <br /> parcels resulting from future subdivisions. <br /> � Our ordinance requires a 50 ' setback from the <br /> + road so the proposed loca�i_on of the tennis court <br /> would require a 20 ' setback variance. <br /> , <br /> I have not as yet receiveu the t000 and pronos��d <br /> � drai�ac� p1_��� , ( ..y_ <br /> C r,;'.`� � '; <br /> � <br /> � <br />