Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 28, 1977 Page 14 <br /> s Welsh moved, Butler seconded, to approve the VARIANCE <br /> variance request for Williamson Construction 3779 Casco Avenue <br /> Company, 3779 Casco Avenue, per the Planning (Continued) <br /> Commission Minutes and recommendations , plus <br /> title opinion submitted to the City and combina- <br /> t tion of Lot 12 & 13. Motion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> � <br /> Henry r�uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE <br /> stated that Mr. Kerriit LaQuey, 190 Cygnet Place, 190 Cygnet Place <br /> first obtained a lot area and width variance #231 <br /> approval for this lot on April 22, 1975. Kermit Lanuey <br /> a Council renewed this approval on February 9 , 1976. <br /> He has currently submitted a third application <br /> for renewal of these same variances. I am <br /> enclosing copies of the last renewal application, <br /> plat map, Planning Commission and Council minutes <br /> and my reports regarding the first two proposals. <br /> , The status of the property has not changed. The <br /> conditions today are the same as they existed <br /> in 1975 when the first application was submitted. <br /> Planning Commission P4eeting - February 22 , 1977 <br /> Recommended approval of renewing lot area and <br /> width variances for another year. <br /> Council Meeting - February 28 , 1977 <br /> Butler moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the <br /> variance request for Kermit LaQuey, 190 Cygnet <br /> Place, per the Planning Commission minutes and <br /> recommendations of February 22, 1977. Motion, <br /> , Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> a Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE & RIP�2AP <br /> stated that J. K. Bowers, 2905 Casco Point Road, 2905 Casco Point Road <br /> is requesting approval to repair an existing #232 <br /> t retaining wall. This consists of replacing J. K. Bowers <br /> s existing concrete walls with untreated timber. <br /> This would require a variance as the wall is <br /> less than 75' from the shoreline. Although <br /> the plans submitted are quite good, they do <br /> not show an elevation view from the lake so <br /> we cannot visualize the height of the proposed <br /> retaining wall. I have sent him a letter <br /> requesting this data. <br /> From what I found on the site, I would like to <br /> suggest we suggest the removal of the existing <br /> concrete slab (hardcover within 75 ' of the lake) . <br /> I think we should have more confirmation that <br /> the proposal does not include any filling or <br /> grading. (Continued) <br />