My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-1977 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
02-28-1977 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2015 3:17:28 PM
Creation date
4/20/2015 3:17:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
w <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL t2EETING HELD FEBRUARY 28, 1977 Page 10 <br /> � Upon the request of Mr. Lee Primus, I inspected SKI-TONKA REPORT <br /> the Ski-Tonka ski area, which is located in (Continued) <br /> � Orono, Minnesota, to deterr,line if the equipment <br /> � met safety requirements. On February l, 1977, <br /> you furnished me with five pages of ANSI <br /> � Regulations that the City of Orono had �urnished <br /> you. The standard is American National Standard <br /> � Safety Requirements for Aerial Passenger <br /> Tramways B77. 1-1973. A copy of the five pages <br /> � are attached to this report. <br /> ! On February 3, 1977, I inspected and tested the <br /> i tow equipment to determine if the equipment <br /> met the safety requirements of the ANSI standards. <br /> � All tows were tested with the exception of #10 <br /> which was inoperable. On February 11, 1977, I <br /> � r;�et with Alan Olson, Orono City Inspector, at <br /> Ski-Tonka to jointly inspect the area and to <br /> � demonstrate to him how the tows were inspected. <br /> � At the time of my inspection, it was noted that <br /> a the ski tows were not equipped with backstop <br /> brakes as required in para. 2. 2. 5. 4. 1. The <br /> � purpose of these brakes is to prevent the ski <br /> ropes �rom being pulled backward if the ski <br /> � tow should stop for some reason. The ski tow <br /> rope was physically pulled backward to determine <br /> the amount of force required to reverse the <br /> direction of travel of the rope. In my opinion, <br /> �he tow rope would not, notwithstanding the <br /> � absence of brakes, reverse direction appreciably. <br /> Any such reversal would likely only result in <br /> � a slow reverse movement. So long as this is <br /> the case, the reverse movement would not present <br /> � a great hazard to a skier using the tow. <br /> � Para. 2. 2. 5. 4.2 of the ANSI standards requires that: <br /> � "Unless an unloaded tow operating at maximum <br /> � speed will stop in 25 feet or less an automatic <br /> brake shall be provided to assure this st�pping <br /> � distance. " <br /> � All tows. met this requirement with the exception <br /> � of tow #3 which had a stopping distance of 28 feet. <br /> Tow #3 is not equipped with an automatic brake. <br /> � The tows were then operated to determine if they <br /> � met the requirements of para. 2. 2. 5. 4. 2, ANSI <br /> Standards which requires that a saftey gate be <br /> � so located that the distance frori the stopping <br /> * device (safety gate) to the first obstruction or <br /> point of reversal of direction to the towing <br /> � outfits is 150 per cent of the distance required <br /> to stop the empty lift operating at maximum <br /> speed. All tows met this requirement with the <br /> exception of tows #3 and #6. (Continued) <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.