Laserfiche WebLink
� ' <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL t�IEETTNG HELD OCTOBER 12 , 1976 pag� � <br /> � Planning Commission Meeting - October 4, 1976 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br /> �` After reviewing the Zoning Administrator's re ort 3340 Shoreline Drive <br /> P , (Continued) <br /> a the Planning Commission recommended denial basecl <br /> on potential negative result from projected <br /> � increase in traffic hazards from proposed land use. <br /> Requested Council review and instruct legal staff <br /> � draft resolution of denial based on data noted <br /> in reporte <br /> r <br /> . Butler moved, Paurus seconded, that the conditional <br /> use permit for Holiday Station Stores, 3340 Shoreline <br /> � Drive, be tablecl until the next Council meeting <br /> at Holiday's request. Pfotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) d <br /> • <br /> r Henry I�Iuhich, Building & Zoning Administratoro VARIANCE <br /> stated that Super Valu Stores, 3333 Shoreline 3333 Shoreline Drive <br /> • Drive, have submitted plans for relocating the #136 <br /> a existing sign from its Present location to the <br /> corner of County Roads #15 & #19. <br /> � The proposed location will meet required setbacks> <br /> � The area of the sign, however, is larger than <br /> area permitted in a B-1 zonee The existing sign <br /> � consists of two parts. The area of the upper <br /> identification sign is 108 sq. ft, and the area <br /> � �f the lower portion of the sign is 64 sq, fte <br /> � or a total of 172 sq. fto Maximum sign area <br /> in our zoning code in B-1 zone is 50 sq. ft. so <br /> • a variance of 122 sq, ft. is necessary. <br /> � The applicant is somewhat pressed for timeo I <br /> do not believe changing the location of the exist- <br /> r ing sign would create any problems. The area of <br /> the structure and lot is also much larger than <br /> � most other properties in the immediate area, so I <br /> � would recommend approval of the variance �aithout <br /> referral to the Planning Commission, <br /> • <br /> Council rieeting - September 27, 1976 <br /> ♦ <br /> Showed concern over extent of non-conformity and <br /> � referred the proposal to the Planning Comm�ssion <br /> ' for further review and recommendations. <br /> � September 30, 1976 <br /> � After informing applicant of sensing objection to <br /> original proposal, a new sign plan has been <br /> � submitted. The total area of this new sign is <br /> ! 55 sqo ft. ouite an improvement from the original <br /> equeste A variance of 5 sq. ft. would be requirede <br /> �l an <br /> ning Commission Meeting - October 4, 1976 <br /> a Recommended approval of 5 sq. fta variance and <br /> � approval of erection of sign as shown on plane (Continued) <br /> � <br />