11-08-1976 Council Meeting Minutes

Home Browse Search

� OROZ10 COUNCIL T�IEETING HELD NOVEP�ZBER 8, 1976 Page 5 � Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the SUBDIViSION �lreliminary subdivision for Ed Lehman, 3527 Shore- 3527 Shoreline Drive ine Drive, per the Planning Commission t7inutes (Continued) � of Ilovember 1,1976, Motion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) . ` IIenry F2uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANC�S � stated that the Planning Commission at their 1342 Rest Point Circle • November l, 1976 meeting recommended apProval #187 of street and side yard setback variances for Harvey Larson � a garage for Harvey Larson, 1342 Rest Point Circlea • Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the � street and side yard setback variances for a garage for Harvey Larson, 1342 Rest Point Circle, � per the Planning Commission P�inutes of November 1, � 19 7 6, rlotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) . � Henry P�Iuhich, }3uilding & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE � stated that the Planning Commission at their 2447 Carman Street November l, 1976 rneeting approved tYie lot area #189 � and width setback variance for Bruce Peterson, I3ruce Peterson 2446 Carman Streete Approval was based on the � fact that there is no additional land available and proposed addition would follow existing house � �xtremities and not encroach the existing setbacks. � ��he proposed addition would make a vast improvement to the property. � Paurus moved, Butler seconded, to a pprove the � lot area and width setback variance for Bruce Peterson, 2446 Carman 5treet, per the Planning � Commission ilinutes of November 1, 1976. Motion, • Ayes (3) - TJays (0) . � Henry T�Iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION � stated that David J. Kruskopf, 1200 Tn7ildhurst 1200 t^�ildhurst Trail Trail, is requesting a lot area and wid"th �gg � variance. David Kruskopf i This property is located in a . LR-1.B residential S zonee T•�r. Kruskopf is requesting a variance from lot area and width requirements of one acre (43,560 � sq. fto ) and 140 ft. lot width. His lot consists of 0, 7 of an acre and is 90 ft. wide; therefore, � he is requesting variances of 13,968 sq. ft. and 50 fte � The proposed location does meet all setback require- ments. However, we do have a problem in the existing t �cation of the residence on the property to the south. We have here a non-conforming situation which we should rectifya At the time that the � neighboring residence was constructed, surveys � were not required with building permit applications. (Continued)