Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL T�IEETING HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1976 Page 18 <br /> � shown on alternate 1A, 5A, and 6A will provide p�plJp_LONG LAKE <br /> � accessability that could legally force Orono to INTERCEPTOR <br /> provide trunk and lateral systems which ��ould (Continued) <br /> � require rezoning to allo� � higher level of <br /> urbaniza�ion to pay the resulting cost5. This <br /> � urbanization would have a primary adverse effect <br /> on the quality of storm water runoff and therefore, <br /> � be detrimental to the lakeo The secondary adverse <br /> • effect of this urbanization would be the increased <br /> cost of schools, roads, police, fire protection, <br /> � and other municipal services which Orono cannot <br /> afford. Alternatives A, B, C, and D more closely <br /> � align themselves with Orono long range plans and <br /> minimize the adverse effects stated above< <br /> � <br /> During the past five years, Orono has sPent much <br /> � time and considerable monies in the planning process <br /> i to insure a balancing of cornplex needs in this <br /> environmental sensitive area contiguous to Lake <br /> w NTinnetonkao These decisions have been made since <br /> the time the proposed interceptor was originally <br /> a justifieda <br /> � 1. The determination of rural and urban service <br /> . areasa <br /> 2o The development of a Comprehensive Guide Plan <br /> � which was adopted by the T7etropolitan Council <br /> November 7, 1974. <br /> � 3. The adopting of a comprehensive zoning ordinance <br /> implementing the Comprehensive Guide Plan. <br /> • 4. The adopting of a Surface Tnlater P�anagement <br /> • Plan developed in conjunction witli the <br /> I•linnehaha Creek ��atershed District Board of <br /> � Governors. <br /> 5. The strengthening of the �^?etlands Preservation <br /> � Ordinance #�125e <br /> G, The imposition of the 6°s mill rate levy <br /> • limitation by the State of I�innesotae <br /> 7. The continuing battle with the Henne�in County <br /> • Highway Department over our established policy <br /> S to preserve the roads on the Minnetonka <br /> shoreline as scenic parkways and to be consistent <br /> � witti the ecology of the lake, rather than tne <br /> County°s desire to pave the shoreline of <br /> � P�innetonka into a massive transportation network. <br /> 8e The completion of a new Comprehensive Sewer <br /> • Plan that establishes the sewer services area <br /> of Orono consistent with the Comprehensive <br /> � Guide Plan and zoning code. <br /> , 90 The reduction of population projections by the <br /> Pletropolitan Council from 35,500 to 12 ,900 and <br /> � a saturation population projection by Orono <br /> � from 23,000 to 12 , 871. <br /> '� (Continued) <br /> � <br /> • <br />