Laserfiche WebLink
� . <br /> � ' <br /> ORONO COUNCIL r�EETING $�LD AUGUST 9, 1976 Page 2 <br /> � <br /> The Cammission felt that this was no� a violation VARIANCF <br /> • by the Petersons tvho pt�r�h�tled th� proPer�y o�tly 135g Park Drive <br /> � one year ago. They were unfortun�te to inherit (Continued) <br /> ah existing non-conforming situation which caas <br /> � never before brought to the attention of th� <br /> staffo <br /> � <br /> Searles moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the <br /> • variance for Wayne Peterson, 1359 Park Drive� <br /> • per the Planning Commission recommendation of <br /> August 2, 1976. Plotion, Ayes (4) - riays (0) . <br /> • <br /> + Henry P�uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE <br /> stated that Michael Curtis, 4200 North Shore 4200 North Shore Drive <br /> � Drive, now resides in a home which is located on <br /> a lot that does not meet the code requirements <br /> '� of 1 acre area and 140 ° lot width. He is <br /> ` requesting approval of a variance to add to the <br /> existing structure. The existing lot contains <br /> � 11,000 sq. fte and is 46' wide at the location <br /> of the housee This lot is �erefore 32,560 sq. <br /> � ft. short of the required lot width. The proposed <br /> addition would not conflict with the required <br /> • setbacks. <br /> � Planning Commission T�teeting - August 2, 1976 <br /> � The Commission recommended approval of this <br /> � variance because the proposed addition would be <br /> replacing the substandard lean-to portion of the <br /> � house, and it would in no way encroach on the <br /> existing setbacks. <br /> • <br /> . Paurus moved, Massengale seconded, to approve the <br /> variance for T�Tichael Curtis, 4200 North Shore <br /> S Drive, per the Planning Commission T�iinutes. <br /> Motion, Ayes (4) - Nays (0) . <br /> r <br /> � Henry 1�4uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE <br /> stated that Fred Ryan, 1345 North Arm Drive, 1345 North Arm Drive <br /> � is requesting approval of an addition hetc,�een <br /> ` his house and garage. Although I have no building <br /> plans yet, he informs me that the setback between <br /> � the structures would be only 4 ' . This would <br /> require a variance of 6' as our ordinance requires <br /> � 10 ' between structures. <br /> • This would not create a problem as we could treat <br /> the garage as an attached garage and require the <br /> � necessary one hour fire wall in the garage to <br /> �provide an adequate fire separation between structures. <br /> � (Continued) <br /> � <br /> � <br />