Laserfiche WebLink
L <br /> OROi10 COUNCIL iZEETING HELD JUNE 28, 1976 Page 6 <br /> The Planning Commission chose not to approve the VO-TECH PROPOSAL <br /> concept until these problems could be resolved. 2950 Sixth Avenue North <br /> » Th�y also suggested the City of Orono communicate (Continued) <br /> w��th the City of Rledina in regard to their views <br /> on the proposal. <br /> � Dic3: IIenson, City Administrator, announcec� that <br /> a meeting has been tentatively arrangec� for <br /> Julv l, 1976 at 7:30 AoM. at the South Vo-Tech <br /> � Campus with representatives from the Cit_y Council <br /> and Planning Commission to tour the facility. <br /> S <br /> � IIutler moved, Searles seconc3ed, that the request VARIANCE <br /> for Lester Raskob, 4220 Chippewa Lane, for a 4220 Chippewa Lane <br /> variance, be approved subject to the Engineer's <br /> ! approval a IZotion, Ayes (5) - D1ays (0) e <br /> The request for Tom P.yan, 1060 Tonkawa Road, for COYTDITIOTdAL USE PERr�IT <br /> s► a conditional use permit for grading was ta�led 1060 Tonkawa Road <br /> � for further information until the next meeting, <br /> � 5earles moved, [aelsh secondedo that the request VARIANCF <br /> � for A1 Hagen, 2530 Casco Point Road, for a lot 2530 Casco Point Road <br /> width variance, be approvedo T�Zotion, Ayes (5) - <br /> � Nays (0) e <br /> ISro Frank Zelley and Verle Poffenberger, SUPER VALU STORE <br /> representing Super Valu, revie�aed their plans 3333 Shoreline Drive <br /> for grading the site located at 3333 Shoreline <br /> Drive, There followed an extensive review by <br /> r -�he City Engineer, Rick Sathre, City Staff and <br /> City Council concerning those plans, Staff <br /> f and Council noted that it is possible that <br /> + their drainage �lans may not be sufficient to <br /> prevent storm water runoff from daMa_qing <br /> neighboring properties, There may be a need <br /> for a storm water retention area on the premiseso <br /> At this time, the City does not know c�hat future <br /> effects there will be and does not want to <br /> � impose upon the applicant, at this time, <br /> additional expense of providing retention ponds <br /> '� or other mechanisms. Instead, the City and <br /> the applicant agree to allow the applicant to <br /> proceed with the plans as will be adopted su?�ject <br /> to the City°s revieca within two to three years. <br /> If the City then finds that the storm water runoff <br /> ?s adversely affecting the surrounding properties, <br /> the applicant or its successor shall take those <br /> � steps necessary as directed by the City Council <br /> to eliminate the problem. (Continued) <br />