My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#4544-after fact variance-2000
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
L
>
Leaf Street
>
80 Leaf Street - 04-117-23-22-0004
>
Resolutions
>
#4544-after fact variance-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:09:08 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:28:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
80
Street Name
Leaf
Street Type
Street
Address
80 Leaf St
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0411723220004
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ � <br /> � � <br /> � � <br /> , CITY of ORONO <br /> � � <br /> ��t �,'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �sHo�`'� No. 4 �� <br /> A. Air photos indicate the pre-existing deck was constructed sometime <br /> between the mid 1970's to the early 1980's. The City does not have a <br /> permit on file for the deck. <br /> B. At its closest point, the deck would not encroach nearer to the protected <br /> tributary than the old deck (48' from the OHWL). <br /> C. A deck would continue to provide a landing for a sliding glass door <br /> located at the reaz of the house. <br /> D. The original deck would have been constructed prior to the adoption of <br /> the Shoreland Ordinance. The Shoreland Ordinance applies to non- <br /> � lakeshore property. Section 10.22, which is the ordinance that regulated <br /> hardcover prior to 1992, applies only to lots zoned Lakeshore Residential <br /> and only to lakeshore properties. The applicant's property is zoned RR- <br /> 1 B and is not a lakeshore property. <br /> E. The total hardcover for the replacement deck within 75' of the creek is <br /> 170 s.f. where 174 s.f. had existed prior to removal of the deck. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property aze peculiar <br /> to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br /> granting the vaziances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br /> pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a <br /> demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent Qf the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> . Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.