Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
� <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL T�2EETING HELD 1�4AY 10, 19 7 6 Page 9 <br /> � Henry Y•luhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCES <br /> stated that Sheldon Quast, 235 Crestview Avenue, 235 Crestview Avenue <br /> is requesting the variances necessary to <br /> onstruct a 4 ft. X 21.3 ft. addition onto the <br /> � rear of his existing residence. The lot is sub- <br /> � standard with 12,525 sq. fte (0.29 acre) versus <br /> 2 acres minimum. The existing house is non- <br /> � conforming with a front setback of 25.2 fto <br /> (50 ft. required) and a side setback of 28.5 fte <br /> � south (30 ft. required) . North side and west <br /> rear setbacks meet the requirements now and <br /> • will do so after the proposed addition is <br /> � constructed. <br /> � Planning Commission r�teeting - May 3, 1976 <br /> � The Planning Commission recommended approval of <br /> the lot area, width and setback variances to <br /> • allow for construction of a 4 fto addition on <br /> • the legal nonconforming residence, <br /> ` Butler moved, Searles seconded, to approve the <br /> variances for Sheldon �uast, 235 Crestview <br /> r Avenue, as per the Planning Commission minutes <br /> of 1�1ay 3, 1976. AZotion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> � Henry 1�luhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION <br /> �tated that Kern Hoppe, Robert Bathke, and 2608 & 2610 r�apleridge <br /> � Christopher Dahl, 2608 & 2610 Mapleridge Lane, Lane <br /> � are requesting approval of a subdivision consist- <br /> ing of property line rearrangemento The existing <br /> � house is on existing Lot 19e Existing Lot 8 is <br /> unbuildable because placement of a structure t� <br /> � meet the City setback requirements (including 75 ft. <br /> lakeshore setback) would locate it within an <br /> i existing private vision easement granted to Lot 19, <br /> � Rearrangement of the lot lines would protect the <br /> lakeshore view of the existing house while allowing <br /> � construction of the proposed residence, Rearrange- <br /> ment would meet all lot area, width, and setback <br /> � regulations on both proposed lotso A private drive- <br /> way easement would be required, <br /> i <br /> • About a year ago, T��re Bathke was denied a variance <br /> from the 75 ft. required setback from the lagoon <br /> � on the propertyo The proposal would provide <br /> adequate area to meet the required se�backs for a <br /> i dwelling. The lot area also qualifies. The lot <br /> width, however, would require a variance of 20 ft. <br /> � as it would be 120 ft. wide (140 ft. required) . <br /> • r''�is is the preliminary only. P4ylars and hardshells <br /> ill be necessary for final approval. The park <br /> dedication fee will also applya A public hearing <br /> � was scheduled for the first meeting in June. <br /> � <br /> � <br />