Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � OROPJO COUNC IL i�IEETING HELD MAY 10, 19 7:� Page 6 <br /> � 2e Location of existing cottage does not meet SUBDIVISION <br /> setback requirement from the property line. 845 Old Long Lake Road <br /> (Continued) <br /> �3o Existing barn would not meet 1.�0 f�o <br /> � setback requirement f�om newly proposed side <br /> � lot line (Ord. Section 34.031� . The appli�ant <br /> could consider a ahoice o�' variance request <br /> � or alteratiori ot propdsed lot lines, <br /> � Planning Commission Meeting - P�lay 3 , lg'76 <br /> � Mr. Sweetser presented hi.s proposalo The <br /> � Commission had concerns about Lot 2 , ��hich <br /> would be approximately t��o acres anc� would <br /> � include two dwelling unit� and a barne The <br /> matter was tabled to give the �pplicant t�.me <br /> � to redraw the prdposed l.o� lines to either <br /> place the cottage on a separate lot f�`om <br /> � the main house or to inCreaSe Lot 2 to four <br /> � acres or moreo <br /> � Henry T�'Iuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, REZONING <br /> � stated that at the Planning Commission meeting 2505 Kelly Avenue <br /> of April 5, 7:976, the Commission held a public <br /> • hearing at which P�Ir. Lindsay explained that <br /> they wished downgrading bf �he commercial <br /> y area to resid�ntial as p�rt of their plans <br /> � for a Planned Residential Development and <br /> felt that this rezoning could be an important <br /> � factor in the upcoming subdivision proposal <br /> (#104) o The Zoning Department expressed the <br /> � feeling that this would be beneficial due <br /> to the topography of the land, consisting <br /> � of hills and ravines, requiring filling and <br /> . grading in order to be utilized for commercial <br /> purposes. Commercial use would result in <br /> � additiona� hardcover and the problems of storm <br /> water runoff and pollution of the lake and <br /> � ground watere Also, it would create a more <br /> natural line between zoning districts, <br /> r <br /> Because T��r, Lindsay did not return for the <br /> � work session part of his subdivision application, <br /> . as expected from earlier discussions in the <br /> evening, the Planning Commission tabled action <br /> � on this matter until after the public hearing <br /> on the subdivision-PRD proposal on April 19 , 1976, <br /> � so that both matters could be considered as a wholeo <br /> • Planning Commission r•Zeeting - April 190 1976 <br /> � Van T1est felt that the City would receive no <br /> � benefit by leaving the strip commercial and <br /> Pesek agreed feeling that if it rem-ined <br /> � commercial, it cot�ld be made into a parking <br /> lot or similar use at a future time. <br /> ` (Continued) <br /> • <br />