Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � OROr10 COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 23, 1976 Page 9 <br /> � The Planning Commission recommended approval of VARIAr10E <br /> �his variance on the condition that the second 4445 North Shore Drive <br /> tory be used for storage only and the existing (Continued) <br /> � garage be removed within 30 days of the completion <br /> of the nec�� garage o <br /> � <br /> [�elsh moved, Butler seeonded, to adopt Resolution RESOLUTION #705 <br /> • #705, A Resolution Denying The Request Of Ken 4445 North Shore Drive <br /> Heroux, 4445 North Shore Dr.ive, For Variances <br /> � Becauses <br /> � 1. Proposed Structure Is Too Large For Existing <br /> � Lot, <br /> 2e Does Not Conform With Existing Residential <br /> • Useso <br /> • T�Iotion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) a <br /> � <br /> � T?r, Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning VARIANCES <br /> Administrator, stated that Gordon Tanke, 144� 1440 Baldur Park Road <br /> � Baldur Park Road, has made application for <br /> variances of lot area and width for addition to <br /> M non-conforming residence, also, street and side <br /> • yard variances. <br /> �his is an existing non-conforming situation. <br /> house and garage now occupy this lot which is <br /> � only about 50 ft. wide and 8,000 sq. ft. in <br /> areao The existing house is approximately 5 ft, <br /> � from the east lot line, The garage is located <br /> l02 ft. from the street right-of-way line and <br /> � almost directly on the west property line. <br /> � Mr, Tanke is requesting the f_ollowing variances <br /> � to add to the existing non-conforming situationo <br /> � lo Area variance of 13, 780 sq. ft. from the <br /> required 21,780 sq, ft. <br /> � 2. Lot width variance of 50 ft. from the <br /> . required 100 fto <br /> • He is also requesting variances for the newly <br /> proposed garage as followso <br /> ! l, Side yard setback variance of 7 ft, from the <br /> � required 10 ft. <br /> 2, Street right-o�f-way setback variance of 10 ft. <br /> � from the required 30 ft, <br /> �i2r. ��anke has noted in his application that he would <br /> remove the existing non-conforming garage. I <br /> ,lieve this would be an improvement to the existing <br /> �onditions, but I also believe we should have more <br /> assurance of removal either by resolution or <br /> •removal hefore a building permit is issued for <br /> the new garage, I believe we could make a recom- <br /> amendation on this proposal without a work session <br /> •reviewo (Continued) <br />