Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> � ORnNO COUNCIL t�EE�ING HELD AUGUST 23, 1976 Page 21 <br /> � Among other things , he mentioned several cars VARIAr10E <br /> � and boa�s that were stored on their property. 1380 Rest Point F.oad <br /> j�rse Benedict was present and explained that (Continued) <br /> � they were storing the boats for a friend of <br /> their son until he could make arrangements to <br /> • store them elsewhere. Her husband c�oes i�ave <br /> • a couple of cars which he uses for spare parts. <br /> Because of the high cost of having garbage <br /> � hauled away, they did accumulate a variety of <br /> different items of trash until they had enough <br /> � for one load. <br /> � The Planning Commission recommends approval of <br /> this non-conforming lot size for the proposed <br /> • addition based upon the fact that the lot <br /> � area cannot be expanded, no setback variance is <br /> required, the area is sewered, property owners <br /> e, tear do�an non-conforming garage prior to obtain- <br /> inq a building permit and the owners make an <br /> * effort to improve appearance on the outside of <br /> the house. <br /> • <br /> • Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve the <br /> variance for Rohert Benedict, 1380 Rest Point <br /> � Road, as per the Planning Commission P�inutes <br /> of August 16, 1976. P7otion, Ayes (5) - rTays (0) e <br /> • <br /> ��Zr. Alan Olson, Assistant Building & Zoning VARIANCE <br /> Administrator, stated that Robert Birkeland, 4500 North Shore Drive <br /> � �500 rdorth Shore Drive, is requesting a lot <br /> ` area variance. The property is located in a <br /> LR-1� zoninc� district. Area requirement is <br /> � 43,560 sq. ft. This lot is approximately <br /> 32, 600 sq. ft. in area. The variance necessary <br /> r would be approximately 11,000 sq. ft. <br /> • P"re Birkeland is requestinc� renewal of_ the same <br /> � variance which was approved by Council July 28, <br /> 1975, ��hich expired through our statute of <br /> � limitations. I would recommend a�proval of the <br /> renewal. I am enclosing copies of minutes from <br /> � the Planning Commission and Council meetings from <br /> a year ago. I believe cae could make a recommendation <br /> � to Council ���ithout the customary work session review< <br /> � Planning Cor.imission r4eeting - August 16, 1976 <br /> � Because this is a renewal of an expired variance, <br /> , the Planning Commission recommended approval <br /> based on the same conditions r.mentionec� in the <br /> � Iiinutes of the July 28, 1975 meeting. <br /> � Butler moved, Searles seconded, to approve the <br /> variance for Robert Birkeland, 4500 rTorth Shore <br /> �' Drive, as ner the Planning Commission P2inutes of <br /> � August 16 , 1976. A�otion, Ayes (5) - ITavs (0) . <br /> � <br />