My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-1976 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1976
>
04-12-1976 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2015 3:47:46 PM
Creation date
4/17/2015 3:47:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> � OFtOPJO COUI�C�L I-TEETING HELD APRIL 12, 1976 Page 6 <br /> • A publ�c Yi�aririg should be scheduled, REZONING <br /> 2505 I:elly Avenue <br /> �lanning Commission i>2eeting - P7arch l, 1976 (Continued) <br /> � The Cc�mmission scheduled a public hearing for the <br /> � 5�h o� Ap�il, 1976 at 7: 45 P,P�I, <br /> • �on�.ng �clrninistrator - April 2, 1976 <br /> � ZDS redent�.y �equested and t�btained preliminary <br /> � a��rnv�l of a subdivi�ion di these original four <br /> parcels into t1z�'ee �arcelso This subdivision was <br /> � determined by t�e descriptions of each parcel as <br /> purchased �y the three new property ownerse This <br /> � Propesed subdivision varied from the currently <br /> described dividing line betcoeen the B-3 and LR-lA <br /> • zones in the area, <br /> � Incidentially, this rezoning, if approved, will <br /> � r�±quire an amendment to our Comprehensive Plan <br /> �lso. <br /> • <br /> I �ould reconnmend approval of this rezoning �or <br /> • tlie following reasons> <br /> � 1. The hew property line running east and 4�est <br /> whickt divides the commercial area from the <br /> �esiclential area follows a more natural break from <br /> � he undeve�oped residential area to the southe <br /> � 2. `��e on�y practical use for this 20 fto strip to <br /> remain cammerci�l w�uld be for additional parking <br /> • and driveway a��a�. ThiS w'ould �inancially be <br /> impractical becau5e of tYie �cost of tillinq and <br /> � c�rading necessary. <br /> � 3, This 20 fto strip is �r�sently covered with <br /> � many trees and ather natural grotath, The p�rc�nt <br /> �o be used Coi�nraercia�ly would �equire remdval of <br /> � all this growth, <br /> • �4. To utilize this strip for parking for the <br /> , existing cofnme�cial establishment would require <br /> additional hardcover which would result in more <br /> , hardcover and storrn water runoff and the <br /> �ollution of Lake iiinnetonka, <br /> • <br /> 5. Rezoning to residential would be a benefit <br /> • to the owner of the or.iginally residentially <br /> zoned district by increasinc� the area which <br /> � c�eterrnines the density of development. (Increase <br /> � number of dwelling units) <br /> �e Residential districts generate less traffic <br /> than comr:iercial districts. <br /> • <br /> (Continued) <br /> • <br /> • <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.