Laserfiche WebLink
� - <br /> � 0�?Oi70 COUNCIL I��EFTING HELD T�IARCIi 8, 1976 Page 2 <br /> � 5earles moved, IIutler g�c¢nded, to adopt RESOLUTION �;664 <br /> Resolution #�664 , A Resolution Approving Hartwood Subdivision <br /> �The Hartwood Subdivisio� by Lewis Scott <br /> � for 2060 Shoreline Drive, effective upon <br /> pul�lication T�larch 18, 1976. Tiotion, <br /> � Ayes (4) - Dlays (0) . <br /> � <br /> • Henry iiuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUT3DIVISIOiJ & STREET <br /> stated that I1r. nuentin Johnson, 3535 Ivy VACATIOPI <br /> � Place, owns Lots 72, 75,76 and part of Lot 77. 3535 Ivy Place <br /> ilra Doubledee recently purchased Lots 73 & 74 <br /> � ancl aPplied for buildinc� permits on the t�ao <br /> substandard lots. I explained the situ�tion <br /> + to tlie applicant so he has made an agreement <br /> U�i�h ilr. Johnson to purchase part of Lot '15 <br /> i and include this in a newly proposed plat <br /> along with the alley which they are also <br /> � ��c�uesting be vacated, <br /> � Parcel 1 would be 94' wide and consist of 0. 40 <br /> � acres and Parcel 2 would exceed 100 ft. v�idth <br /> and consist ot Oo4�, acre�e This area is <br /> • zoned LR-1C (1/2 aCre - 100 ft. lot wiclth) , <br /> � A��proval of this subdivision would include <br /> �che following variances: <br /> � :.'arcel 1 - Ool acre area and 6 f�a lot width <br /> � Parcel 2 - Oo01 ac�e area only <br /> � �pg�roval of the vacation of the a1].ey wbuld <br /> also be neces�arye The Planning Comrais�ion <br /> � should schedule a public hearing rega�ding <br /> . �h?s subdivision and vacation propo5al. <br /> � Planning Commission Tleeting - Jai�uary 19, 1976 <br /> The Conunission scheduled a public hearing f_or <br /> 7030 P.I�Ie on Tuesday, February 17, 197G. <br /> � <br /> The Planning Comr.rnission agreed the proposed <br /> � alley vacati.on would be no benefit to the <br /> c�eneral public but would definitely increase <br /> � �he values of the subject properties, They <br /> � requested the Zoning Administrator to consult <br /> with the assessor to determine the benefit <br /> � that would result from this vacationa <br /> � P�anning Commission �leeting - February 17, 1976 <br /> Because of the extent of objection at the puhlic <br /> � hearing, the Planning Corunission continued the <br /> ��ublic hearing until the meeting of PZarch l, 1976 <br /> far time for additional review of the proposalo (Continued) <br /> � <br />