Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO COUNCIL I�EETING HELD FEBRUARY 23, 1976 Page 8 <br /> i Henry �Tuhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION <br /> stated that Van Dale is presently located on 2705 Wayzata Bou.l�va�_d <br /> � Parcel 1 of the enclosed plat map and su'rvey, <br /> They are now in the process of adding to the <br /> existing structure on the property to the west <br /> which they currently purchased under contract <br /> for deed from Anna T, Holter, 2705 �^7ayzata <br /> , Boulevard, <br /> They cannot, however, obtain a mortgage tor this <br /> addition until they have clear title to the lande <br /> ' The two parties have agreed on transfer of title <br /> � of the Parcel 2 portion of this land until such <br /> time that the remainder due is paide <br /> � I see no problem here but we should schedule <br /> _ a date for a public hearing on the proposed <br /> subdivisione <br /> Planning Commiss�on PZeeting - January 19 , 1976 <br /> , The Commission scheduled a public hearing to <br /> be held on Tuesday, February 17, 1976 at 8000 PoP�1a <br /> � <br /> Plann�ng Commission Meeting - February 17, 1976 <br /> Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br /> " preliminary plat of the lot split and rearrangeme�t <br /> - as proposedo <br /> ' Butler moved, P�assengale seconded, to approve the <br /> subdivision request for Anna T, Holter, 2705 Wayzata <br /> Boulevard, as per the Planning Commission recom- <br /> mendations of February 17, I976a P�otion, Ayes (4) - <br /> � Nays (0) , <br /> � Henry Muhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, SUBDIVISION <br /> stated that I�Ir. Dale t2cCurdy, 4041 North Shore 4041 North Shore D����� <br /> Drive, owns Lots 7 & 8, He is proposing to <br /> build an addition on his existing home which <br /> � would extend to the present west lot line of <br /> Lot 8, His neighbor who owns both Lots 9 & 10 <br /> � has agreed to sell him 11' of Lot 9 to provide <br /> adequate area for the necessary side yard setback. <br /> �iro McCurdy has requested this change by simply <br /> deducting this 11° strip from Lot 90 Lot 9, <br /> however, is already substandardo T�1ro Barbush <br /> a;�ns both Lots 9 & 10, so I would recommend <br /> tne subdivision be considered on the basis of <br /> combining Lots 7, 8 and the strips of Lot 9 as <br /> or.e parcel and combining the remaining portion <br /> of Lot 9 with Lot 10 as another individual <br /> parcel to eliminate all of these existing <br /> � substandard situations, (Continued) <br />