Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> OROVO COUNCIL MEETING HELD JANUARY 26, 1976 Page 4 <br /> � On review of the renewal proposal, I find the VARIANCE <br /> variance woulc� also have to include hardcover 650 North Arm Drive <br /> setback (34, 303) and lakeshore grading (Ord. (Continued) <br /> Noe 125 and Noe 167) a The site plan sub- <br /> mitted shows extensive grading and hardcover <br /> between the house and lakeshore. All of this <br /> ���ork would be done within the 75 ' setback area> <br /> � Another factor worth considering would be <br /> � moving the location of the structure 5 ' <br /> closeer to the road, This caould require a 5' <br /> � variance from the 35 ' street setback requirement <br /> • and only 10 ' variance from the lakeshore. <br /> Nine of the 10 ' extending into the required <br /> , 75 ' lakeshore setback would consist of the <br /> attached open deck. <br /> � <br /> The applicant should also be reminded "of the <br /> • restrictions on grading and changing of <br /> existing lakeshore conditionso <br /> Planning Commission Action - October 21, 1975 <br /> � The Planning Commission t�bled the Russell <br /> � ��enkstern application for a time when the <br /> owner would be presento <br /> Zoning Administrator° s memo - December 19, 1975 <br /> i�s�:, T��enkstern called T�Tike Scheller while I was <br /> ill and said he would be present at this <br /> Planning Commission meeting to explain his <br /> p�oposale He would, therefore, be made aware <br /> or any conditions stipulated regarding filling, <br />� grading and hardcovero <br />• Zoning Administrator's memo - January 12 , 1976 <br /> T�Ir, Wenkstern has assured me he would attend <br />� the Planning Commission meeting of January 19 , <br />� 1976 . <br /> Planning Commission T�eeting - January 19, 1976 <br />� The Commission recommended approval of a variance <br />� on lot area and street setback requirement. They <br /> also approved a variance not to exceed 8 ° from <br />� tYie required 35 ' street setback. The variance <br />• from the 75 ' lakeshore setback requirement was <br /> not approved. <br />� Butler moved, Paurus seconded, to approve as <br />� per the Planning Commission T�Iinutes of January 19, <br /> 1976, subject to no gradinc� nor tree removale <br />� ilotion, Ayes (3) - Nays (0) 0 <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />