My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1976 Council Meeting Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
01-26-1976 Council Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2019 1:06:39 PM
Creation date
4/17/2015 3:47:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A <br /> ,� ORONO COUNCTL N�ETIPIG HELD JANUARY 26 - 1976 Page 12 <br /> � Lots 13, 14, 15 & 16 in Block 6, Townsite of SUBDIVISIOPI <br /> Lungdon Park, into three (3) separate parcelso 3�25 Shoreline Drive <br />� Parcel 1 would ��onsist of all of these four (4) (Continued) <br /> lots except the north 230 ' thereof. Parcel 2 <br /> would consist of the easterly 184.68 ' of the <br /> � north 230 ° of tne four (4) lotse Parcel 3 <br /> would consist of the remainder of the north <br /> ,� 2 30' �_;:E' the four. (4) lots. Attached hereto <br /> is a survey of proposed Parcel 1 dated <br /> � �?ar.uary 8, 1976, made by C. E, Coulter & <br /> Associates, Inc, , and a survey of proposed <br /> • Parcels 2 & 3 dated January 14, 1976, made <br /> ' by C. E, Coulter & Associates, Inc, <br /> � The propased establishment of Parcel 1 ��ould <br /> carry out the intent of the Orono zoning <br /> � ordinance as �his land is currently zoned <br /> residential, while Parcels 2 & 3 are zoned <br /> � co*nmercial. The establishment of Parcels 2 <br /> ��nd 3 would permit separate ownership of <br /> � the existing buildings on that land: The <br /> . proposed division 1�_ne follows the centerline <br /> of a party wall separating two existing <br /> � buildings as shccan in the survey dated January 14, <br /> Z976, No new development is planned by the <br /> � nL�rchasers of proposed F-_rcels .2 & 3. The <br /> owner of proposed Parcel 1 e�ould, of course, <br /> � have to pl�t that parcel at such time as he <br /> c'�v�Io�s i�� residenti�.I_ly, <br /> � �lthough it is not clezr, it appears that Orono <br /> Ord�nance iVo, 39 may require a platting of the <br /> � subject property in order to accomplish my <br /> client° s plan. Even if platting is not <br /> � req�ired, h�wever, municipal approval is a <br /> p�actical necessity as the plan requires the <br /> '� d�signation of new tax parcels. The subject <br /> . �Non�rty is currently comprised of four (4) <br /> r�arc�ls, being Parcel Nose 2520, 2540 , 2550 and <br /> � ?.5G5 in Plat No. 42420. From a planning <br /> point of view, ho�aever, platting would seem a <br /> � n�edless waste of time and money for, as <br /> �tated above, no new development of Parcels <br /> • % F: 3 is proposed and Parcel 1 would have to <br /> b� platted at the tim� of its developmento <br /> O <br /> • TT1ri?7!?S:�+'c-i Statutes, Section 462. 358, Subd. 4, <br /> provides that vahere compliance with municipal <br /> � subdivision regulations will create an unnecessary <br /> rardship and failure to comply will not interfere <br /> � :�i�ii �he purnose of the subdivision regulations, <br /> the platting authority may waive such compliance <br /> • ��v acoption of a resolution to that eiiect. <br /> Althcugh I have not ^�en Orono Ordinance PJoe 132, <br /> I ur_Gerstand that it �ay deal Geith this situation <br /> � and permit the City Council to waive compliance <br /> with Orclinance No. 39, � <br /> • <br /> � (Continued) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).