My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-16-1975 Council Meeting Minutes Joint Advisory Conference
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
12-16-1975 Council Meeting Minutes Joint Advisory Conference
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2015 2:45:53 PM
Creation date
4/17/2015 2:45:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � <br /> �. •-� , ' CIT'Y OF ORONO, MTNNESOTA . <br /> JOINT-ADVISORY CONFERENCE HELD DECEA�BER 16, 1975 <br /> • <br /> 1�1a.yor Robert L. Searles called to order a joint conference MULTIPLE DWELLING CODE <br /> or discussion of the proposed A�zltiple Dwelling Ordinance. JOINT CONFERENCE <br /> . n attendance were Cowicilman Walter Massengale; Planning ORONO CITY HALL - 7:30 P.M. <br /> Commission Members Fred Curtis, Diane D�lap, C. Paul Pesek <br /> � and Brad Van Nest; Deputy Clerk, Alberta Strom; Zoning Admin- <br /> istrator, Henry Nfuhich; City Engineer, Rick Sather and public <br /> � citizens interested in the proceedings. <br /> ir <br /> . Mayor Searles called attention to receipt of suggested changes <br /> to the proposed Multiple Dwelling code from Paul Roberts of <br /> e Gagne Developers. Because there were insufficient copies <br /> to distribute Mr. Roberts brought out the essential points to <br /> � his proposal during the body of the meeting. Another proposal <br /> submitted by Brad Van Nest was received with a favorable reac- <br /> � tion. It was entitled °"Memorandum to the Village Council re- <br /> garding a proposed �Iultiple Dwelling Ordinance", dated Decem- <br /> r ber 16, 1975, and is hereto. attached as part of this record. <br /> � After all had reviewed the proposal, I��a.ssengale expressed his <br /> � view that there could be a potential problem of second turn- <br /> arol.md of a lone, si.ngle-family �it, if it should occur, <br /> � amongest multiple wiits. Roberts wondered. whether the pro- <br /> � posal would create a problem with the PRD portion of the Zoning <br /> Code. Van. Nest felt it would just add to the flexibility of <br /> � design potential for prospective developers. Van Nest ex- <br /> lained that his proposal would allow either private ownership <br /> � �r Homeowners Associations and it was noted that a large area <br /> could have more than one association. Searles felt that the <br /> code should state that the developer must include ownership <br /> . plans as part of his applicatian and felt that there was no <br /> public purpose to restrictions on type of ownership. Ma.ssen- <br /> gale liked the features of the Van Nest proposal that would <br /> + a11ow flexibility of design and the ability to estimate <br /> ,� utilities and co�nunity needs, although, he expressed doubts <br /> about Homeowners Associations that could break down because <br /> � of involvement with personalities. The City Engineer stated <br /> that when the City allows Homeowners Associations to come into <br /> w existence and maintain an area, the functions that could even- <br /> tually be taken over by the City should be specified in tile <br /> � code. Regarding ownership of dwellings of horizantal units as <br /> � opposed to vertical �its, it was agreed that this feature would, <br /> in part, detennine the type of ownership situations within a <br /> � district. Roberts requested that the City take into account the <br /> HUD "Subdivision Development Guidelines" because money would not <br /> � be available to a developer unless these policies are followed. <br /> • <br /> i The Council members and those in attendance agreed tha.t the Van <br /> Nest proposal should be submitted to the City Attorney to be <br /> • drafted into Ordinance form, for Planning Commission and Council <br /> �view, and eventual presentation at a public heari�g and that <br /> �the following be i.n,clud.ed in the code: <br /> � �1) 'That the code direct the applicant to submit an owner- <br /> ,� ship prorposal along with his plans. <br /> ♦ � : <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.