Laserfiche WebLink
�, ' <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL 1�2EET2NG HELD DECEI�IBER 8, 1975 Page 3 <br /> � P�?r. Brad Van Nest, Planning Commission SUBDIVISION <br /> �meriber, replacing P.4r. Henry Muhich, Building 3080 North Shore Drive <br /> & Zoning Administrator stated that Mr. Dykstra <br /> • is requesting approval of a subdivision of his <br /> property consisting of 2. 22 acres into two <br /> (l�' �arcels each of which would exceed the minimum <br /> � :'.ot size of one acre. Both parcels would <br /> �-.xceed the minimum lot width requirement of <br /> � 140 ft. Following completion of the 73-1 <br /> ��wer project, this property was assessed for <br /> r '��ro units, <br /> 1 ^oth properties would require private easements-- <br /> one for access to the road and the other for <br /> � •--.^cess to the lake. <br /> � �lanning Commission P��eeting - December 3, 1975 <br /> � tv the area having long, deep lots, the <br /> r.,� <br /> �, ':::mmission ex�ressed concern as to public <br /> . <br /> ���inion of the possibility of another row of <br /> • � �uses in the neighborhood. The Commission <br /> � ��_rected that a Public Hearing be held on <br /> �anuary 19, 1976 at 7:30 P.Ai, in the Orono <br /> � �?llage Hall. <br /> • <br /> r'he request of Robert Frost, 4625 Chippewa VARIANCE <br /> • Tane, for a variance on side and rear setback 4625 Chippewa Lane <br /> ���quirementso <br /> '�'hz property lies in a RR-lA (5 acre) zoning <br /> � c,istricte The setback requirements are 100 ft. <br /> � _'=-=om the rear lot line and 50 ft. from the <br /> �ide 1ot lines. This lot, howevero is slightly <br /> � �_�ss than one acre. <br /> • rih� proposed location of the new garage is <br /> ?5 ft. from the side lot line and 35 ft. from <br /> � '�he rear lot linea A variance of 27 ft. from <br /> � the side and 65 ft. from the rear setback <br /> requirements would be necessary, <br /> � The existing dwelling ,is located 124 fte from <br /> ,* t:he east lot line. The garage could be located <br /> in this area but some grading would be necessary, <br /> r F.n attached garage might be considered. <br /> � 'Che Planning Commission recommended to the <br /> �, C�uncil that due to the lot being in existence <br /> nrior to the new zoning and that the petition <br /> � �:-ould have met conditions of a one acre zone, <br /> .:ipproval of the variance request be granted, <br /> � uu-c conditioned that final approval by the <br /> 3uilding Inspector be withheld until the <br /> � ���isting shed be torn down. <br /> • (Continued) <br /> 1 <br />