Laserfiche WebLink
� ' <br /> • OROT10 COTJIdCIL tiEETING Ii�LD DECETZB�R 8, 1975 Page 12 <br /> M 5e That expanding development results in RESOLUTION #655 <br /> � additional hardcover increasing the Eisinger Landfill <br /> necessity of the natural filtrative and (Continued) <br /> � retention of storm water runoff provided <br /> by the existing marshlands and ��etlands. <br /> i 6, That increasec� traffic resulting from the <br /> operation would add to the existing <br /> � hazardous traffic conditions on the high <br /> � speed, heavy traveled Iiighcaay DTo. 12 . <br /> 7, That the access to the pronerty is locatecl <br /> � dangerously near the base of a dip in the <br /> high��ay, <br /> � B, That the more hazardous traffic conditions <br /> would contribute to the danger of the children <br /> • in the nearby school, <br /> S 90 That the property is presently being used <br /> for residential purposes and the raising <br /> and grazing of horseso <br /> � 10< That the proposed use is commercial- <br /> � indust'rial in nature and not compatible <br /> ���ith other uses in the areao <br /> i 11, That the proposed landfill conflicts with <br /> Ordinance T�do, 12 5, <br /> r 12, That the proposed landfill would place <br /> � artificial obstruction restricting the <br /> path of floodwatero <br /> � 13o That the Fish and Wildlife Service recommends <br /> this proposal be denied, <br /> � �4, That the Pollution Control Agency, after <br /> their finding of facts, concluded their <br /> � approval should in no manner be construed <br /> � as liniiting the City of Orono in its approval, <br /> denial, or modification of this pro�osed landfill. <br /> � 15o That the Pollution Control Agency, in their <br /> findings of facts of Ty�iay 23, 1975, stated <br /> � the owner had voluntarily closed the landfill <br /> operation in 1970 as he felt he could not <br /> "� economically operate under Plinnesota Pollution <br /> Control Ac�ency regulationso <br /> • 16. That a letter frort the City Building Inspector <br /> of the City of Orono to the ilinnehaha Creek <br /> ! []atershed District dated April 11, 1972, states <br /> � that the o�ane� closed his operation saying it <br /> was impossible to comply v�ith the conditions in <br /> � the time allotted, <br /> 17, That the Hennepin County De�artment of Public <br /> � t)or'ks� after reviewing the application, stated <br /> + they are not prepared to recomrnend a license <br /> because of environmental concern. <br /> + iII, That the location of the proposed landfill is <br /> only about six hundred feet from Lake Classen, <br /> �19e That operation of a lanrlfill at this location <br /> � would result in a diminution of value of surrounding <br /> �ropertiese <br /> 20o That the proposed landfill would be contrary <br /> r to the Com�rehensive Land Use Plan previously <br /> � ado�ted by the city anc? the intents and <br /> purposes of the Zoning Code. <br /> � (Continued) <br />