Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> � ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEl�lBER 24, 1975 Page 12 <br /> � This tree is leaning toward the lake and Pdr. VARIANCE <br /> iuicCaffrey is afraid a high wind might ti�p it 1065 t�Test Ferndale <br /> � over uprooting some of the other newer plantings (Continued) <br /> � �n the area. Since purchasing the property <br /> three years ago, he has planted about 400 various <br /> � trees and shrubs on the site. <br /> � The Planning Commission recommended to the Council <br /> '�hat the variance application to remove �ne <br /> • tree within 75' of the lakeshore be approved <br /> as submitted as the applicant has added many <br /> M additional plantings since purchasing the property. <br /> � Paurus moved, Welsh seconded, to approve the <br /> � variance request for I�laurice T�ZcCaffrey, 1065 <br /> G��lest Ferndale Road, conditioned on the removal <br /> • �f only one tree within 75 ' of the lakeshore. <br /> T�Totion, Ayes (5) - Nays (0) . <br /> • <br /> � In regard to the street and sideyard setback VARIANCE <br /> � va.riance for Earl Norwood, 1360 Vine Place, 1360 Vine Place <br /> Henry A4uhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, <br /> � ^tated in June, 1975, Mre Norwood applied for <br /> �_ permit to move his existing garage to provide <br /> � '-he location for a new garage. On review, we <br /> found the parcel on which he was proposing to <br /> � �auild was a lot without a main structure and <br /> ,� separate from the lot on which his home was <br /> :�tandinga He owns: the four adjoining parcels <br /> � (4. 450, 4825, 4778 and 4755) . I explained to <br /> him that our code did not permit the construction <br /> • of an accessory building without a main structure. <br /> � also explained the current substandard <br /> • status of the four adjoining parcels and <br /> � suggested he combine them to provide the <br /> necessary main structure. <br /> i ? reviewed the matter with the Hennepin County <br /> � Tax Department and learned these parcels could <br /> not be combined unless the tax status on all <br /> • parcels were equal. Currently, one parcel is <br /> �ax delinquent from 1974 and three parcels <br /> • are delinquent since 1971. I informed Pir. <br /> � Norwood af this requirement. <br /> � :"'ze proposed location of the garage would <br /> require two variances regardless of the <br /> � combination, however, the location as proposed <br /> is 5' from the side lot line and 5 ' from the <br /> • street lot line. Two variances of 5 ' and 30 ' <br /> • _-espectively would be necessary. <br /> tro Nortaood has not combined the lots as yet <br /> �ut has agreed to pay up the delinquent taxes <br /> � �nd combi.ne the properties providing these <br /> -��riances are approvede The approval should <br /> � <br /> (Continued) <br /> • <br />