Laserfiche WebLink
OROt10 COUNCIL AZEETING HELD NOVETZBER 2�, 1975 Page 10 <br /> November 18, 1975, the public hearing continued ULNIER COr15TRUCTI�N C0. <br /> from the previous meetinge The Village (Continued) <br /> �ngineer confirmed the wetlands area at a total <br /> of one acre. However, the Engineer' s findings <br /> showed that the survey presented by the petitioner <br /> s included the road right-of-way in computing the <br /> total buildable area. This reduced the buildable <br /> area of the proposed 1. 73 acre lot to 1.47 acres, <br /> t the 1085 acre lot to 1,57 acres and the 2075 <br /> acre track to 2. 32 with the_one acre �aetland area <br /> included, Previous concern as to a creek running <br /> through the tract was unfoundedo <br /> The Planning Commission would not recommend to <br /> � the Council approval of the Ulmer Construction <br /> = Company subdivision as it was presently proposed <br /> but would table the petition until the applicant <br /> could present an alternate plan showing only <br /> two lots as the entire parcel consists of only <br /> 4. 36 dry buildable area in a two acre zoned <br /> distric�t. <br /> Henry T��luhich, Building & Zoning Administrator, VARIANCE <br /> � stated. that Carol Ann Bialon, 3329 Crystal 3329 Crystal Bay Road <br /> Bay Road, construction of an added deck was <br /> suspended by the Building Inspector for failure <br /> to obtain a building permit> Further investigation <br /> discl sed the addition did not comply with the <br /> minimum lakeshore setback requirement of 75 ' , <br /> T�irso Bialon was informed of the required variance <br /> and building permit and has since filed the � <br /> t enclosed application�•of a variance of 14 ° from <br /> the required lakeshore setbacke <br /> � <br /> Although the existing dwelling is only 58 ' from <br /> the shoreline and the deck is to be of the open <br /> , slat type, I believe a variance should be <br /> r_equired so we can stipulate approved types of <br /> construction only and also instruct the applicant <br /> that any future changes into a solid deck or <br /> t roof cover would be prohibited. <br /> A survey would have to be submitted by the <br /> applicant to confirm all dimensions before a <br /> building permit would be issuedo <br /> November 14, 1975 memo <br /> The Building Inspector informed me the deck was <br /> completed when he discovered the addition for <br /> � which P�Zrse Bialon is now requesting a variance, <br /> She obtained a building permit for the work being <br /> done on the building November 4, 1975. <br /> (Continued) <br />